2012Journal of Clinical StomatologyRequires access

Clinical effect research of different root-end filling materials

Han You Jin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:Compare the clinical effect of different root-end filling materials.Method:Choose 69 patients(72 teeth)who have under the common RCT and not completely cured,random divide them to 3 groups,group 1 with material MTA(group M,24 teeth),group 2 with material silver amalgam(group Y,24 teeth),group 3 with material Glass ionomer silver reinforced restorative(group B,24 teeth).All groups do root-end excision,backward preparing and root-end filling.Statistical analys the data of follow-up visit after 6 months,12 months and 24 months and the incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction,divide the results to 3 kinds by physical sign and imageology.Result:The total healing rate(2 years)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the total healing rate(2 years)of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months) of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05.The incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction of group 1 is higher then group 2 and group 3,but p0.05,doesn't have statistical significance.Conclusion:Comparing the 3 groups,the efficiency of root tip hermetization of material better,the healing rate of root-end filling higher.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:Compare the clinical effect of different root-end filling materials.Method:Choose 69 patients(72 teeth)who have under the common RCT and not completely cured,random divide them to 3 groups,group 1 with material MTA(group M,24 teeth),group 2 with material silver amalgam(group Y,24 teeth),group 3 with material Glass ionomer silver reinforced restorative(group B,24 teeth).All groups do root-end excision,backward preparing and root-end filling.Statistical analys the data of follow-up visit after 6 months,12 months and 24 months and the incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction,divide the results to 3 kinds by physical sign and imageology.Result:The total healing rate(2 years)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the total healing rate(2 years)of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months) of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05.The incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction of group 1 is higher then group 2 and group 3,but p0.05,doesn't have statistical significance.Conclusion:Comparing the 3 groups,the efficiency of root tip hermetization of material better,the healing rate of root-end filling higher.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:Compare the clinical effect of different root-end filling materials.Method:Choose 69 patients(72 teeth)who have under the common RCT and not completely cured,random divide them to 3 groups,group 1 with material MTA(group M,24 teeth),group 2 with material silver amalgam(group Y,24 teeth),group 3 with material Glass ionomer silver reinforced restorative(group B,24 teeth).All groups do root-end excision,backward preparing and root-end filling.Statistical analys the data of follow-up visit after 6 months,12 months and 24 months and the incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction,divide the results to 3 kinds by physical sign and imageology.Result:The total healing rate(2 years)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the total healing rate(2 years)of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months)of group 1 is higher then group 2 and 3,P 0.05;the completely healing rate(3 months) of group 2 and 3 doesn't have obviously significance,P 0.05.The incidence rate of short term(1 week)inflammatory reaction of group 1 is higher then group 2 and group 3,but p0.05,doesn't have statistical significance.Conclusion:Comparing the 3 groups,the efficiency of root tip hermetization of material better,the healing rate of root-end filling higher.

Key concepts: Statistical significance, Dentistry, Amalgam (chemistry), Medicine, Glass ionomer cement, Clinical significance, Group (periodic table), Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical effect research of different root-end filling materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens