A Comparison of MENG Zi and XUN Zi's Theories about Human
Liu Feng-quan
Abstract
Liu Feng-quan
Abstract
Both MENG Zi and XUN Zi's theories about human are on the basis of human being, centered around social politics and expatiate the squirearchy's systemic understanding of human and society. Though there are some ostensible differences, they are essentially complimentary in politics which laid the theoretical foundation for the moral politics of feudalist society. The understanding of the views about human being is facilitative to the understanding of the nation's history and status quo as well as the promotion of nation building.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Both MENG Zi and XUN Zi's theories about human are on the basis of human being, centered around social politics and expatiate the squirearchy's systemic understanding of human and society. Though there are some ostensible differences, they are essentially complimentary in politics which laid the theoretical foundation for the moral politics of feudalist society. The understanding of the views about human being is facilitative to the understanding of the nation's history and status quo as well as the promotion of nation building.
Key concepts: Politics, Status quo, Promotion (chess), Foundation (evidence), Sociology, Environmental ethics, Epistemology, Aesthetics