2006PubMedRequires access

[Value of the clinical pulmonary infection score for the prognosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia].

Guohui Yang, Guangfa Wang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the performance of the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and its prognostic value for early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: The clinical data of 62 cases with VAP in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) were studied. The CPIS score was calculated at 3 days before the onset of VAP (VAP-3), at the onset of VAP (VAP+1), and at 3 (VAP+3), 5 (VAP+5), and 7 (VAP+7) days after onset, and the pathogens were examined. RESULTS: A significant higher CPIS score was found at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.2 +/- 1.5, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.3 +/- 1.3, 5 (VAP+5) 7.0 +/- 2.1, and 7 (VAP+7) 5.8 +/- 3.5 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.3 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01). An increase of CPIS was significant in nonsurvivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.4 +/- 1.8, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.7 +/- 1.5, 5 (VAP+5) 8.5 +/- 1.4, and 7 (VAP+7) 8.9 +/- 1.4 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) (3.6 +/- 1.1) (P < 0.01). An increase in CPIS was also significant in survivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 6.9 +/- 1.0, at 3 (VAP+3) 6.9 +/- 1.1, and 5 (VAP+5) 5.5 +/- 1.6 day after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.1 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01), but the decrease in CPIS was significant at 7 (VAP+7) 2.7 +/- 1.8 day after VAP onset (P < 0.01). In patients with a CPIS > 6 at 5 days after VAP onset, the mortality was higher than those with a CPIS < 6 (P = 0.00). The sensitivity and specificity of predicted mortality was 96.8 percent and 74.2 percent respectively. There was a significant correlation between CPIS score and length of mechanical ventilation (r = 0.526, P = 0.00) and length of respiratory intensive care unit stay (r = 0.449, P = 0.00) and the length of hospital stay (r = 0.519, P = 0.00). Patients receiving adequate therapy showed a slight fall in CPIS at VAP+5, whereas those with inadequate therapy did not. CONCLUSION: Serial measurement of CPIS is valuable in predicting the severity of illness and evaluating the effect of therapy and prognosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the performance of the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and its prognostic value for early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: The clinical data of 62 cases with VAP in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) were studied. The CPIS score was calculated at 3 days before the onset of VAP (VAP-3), at the onset of VAP (VAP+1), and at 3 (VAP+3), 5 (VAP+5), and 7 (VAP+7) days after onset, and the pathogens were examined. RESULTS: A significant higher CPIS score was found at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.2 +/- 1.5, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.3 +/- 1.3, 5 (VAP+5) 7.0 +/- 2.1, and 7 (VAP+7) 5.8 +/- 3.5 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.3 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01). An increase of CPIS was significant in nonsurvivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.4 +/- 1.8, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.7 +/- 1.5, 5 (VAP+5) 8.5 +/- 1.4, and 7 (VAP+7) 8.9 +/- 1.4 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) (3.6 +/- 1.1) (P < 0.01). An increase in CPIS was also significant in survivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 6.9 +/- 1.0, at 3 (VAP+3) 6.9 +/- 1.1, and 5 (VAP+5) 5.5 +/- 1.6 day after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.1 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01), but the decrease in CPIS was significant at 7 (VAP+7) 2.7 +/- 1.8 day after VAP onset (P < 0.01). In patients with a CPIS > 6 at 5 days after VAP onset, the mortality was higher than those with a CPIS < 6 (P = 0.00). The sensitivity and specificity of predicted mortality was 96.8 percent and 74.2 percent respectively. There was a significant correlation between CPIS score and length of mechanical ventilation (r = 0.526, P = 0.00) and length of respiratory intensive care unit stay (r = 0.449, P = 0.00) and the length of hospital stay (r = 0.519, P = 0.00). Patients receiving adequate therapy showed a slight fall in CPIS at VAP+5, whereas those with inadequate therapy did not. CONCLUSION: Serial measurement of CPIS is valuable in predicting the severity of illness and evaluating the effect of therapy and prognosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the performance of the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and its prognostic value for early onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: The clinical data of 62 cases with VAP in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) were studied. The CPIS score was calculated at 3 days before the onset of VAP (VAP-3), at the onset of VAP (VAP+1), and at 3 (VAP+3), 5 (VAP+5), and 7 (VAP+7) days after onset, and the pathogens were examined. RESULTS: A significant higher CPIS score was found at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.2 +/- 1.5, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.3 +/- 1.3, 5 (VAP+5) 7.0 +/- 2.1, and 7 (VAP+7) 5.8 +/- 3.5 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.3 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01). An increase of CPIS was significant in nonsurvivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 7.4 +/- 1.8, and at 3 (VAP+3) 7.7 +/- 1.5, 5 (VAP+5) 8.5 +/- 1.4, and 7 (VAP+7) 8.9 +/- 1.4 days after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) (3.6 +/- 1.1) (P < 0.01). An increase in CPIS was also significant in survivors at the onset of VAP (VAP+1) 6.9 +/- 1.0, at 3 (VAP+3) 6.9 +/- 1.1, and 5 (VAP+5) 5.5 +/- 1.6 day after onset compared with at 3 days before VAP (VAP-3) 3.1 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.01), but the decrease in CPIS was significant at 7 (VAP+7) 2.7 +/- 1.8 day after VAP onset (P < 0.01). In patients with a CPIS > 6 at 5 days after VAP onset, the mortality was higher than those with a CPIS < 6 (P = 0.00). The sensitivity and specificity of predicted mortality was 96.8 percent and 74.2 percent respectively. There was a significant correlation between CPIS score and length of mechanical ventilation (r = 0.526, P = 0.00) and length of respiratory intensive care unit stay (r = 0.449, P = 0.00) and the length of hospital stay (r = 0.519, P = 0.00). Patients receiving adequate therapy showed a slight fall in CPIS at VAP+5, whereas those with inadequate therapy did not. CONCLUSION: Serial measurement of CPIS is valuable in predicting the severity of illness and evaluating the effect of therapy and prognosis.

Key concepts: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Medicine, Pneumonia, Internal medicine, Intensive care unit, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Value of the clinical pulmonary infection score for the prognosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens