2006•Journal of OncologyRequires access

Sequential Chemotherapy and Boost Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for 31 Cases with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III

Xing Lu-qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Purpose] To compare the efficacy and toxicity of sequential chemotherapy and boost intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)with sequential chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)stage Ⅲ.[Methods] Eighty-seven cases of stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer were divided into 2 groups:group A and group B.Thirty-one cases of group A were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen 1~2 cycles,conventional radiotherapy 40Gy/20f,4W,and boost IMRT with a total dose of(70~74)Gy/(35~37)f,and after radiotherapy chemotherapy to be continued.Fifty-six cases of group B were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen and conventional radiotherapy with a total dose of(60~64)Gy/(30~32)f,(6~7)W.[Results] Eighty-seven cases followed up for 24 to 36 months.The overall response rate,1-and 2-year survival rates in group A and group B were 80.65% vs.76.56%,51.61% vs.35.71% and 35.48% vs.17.86% respectively with no significant difference.The radiation esophagitis,radiation pneumonitis and myelosuppression in group A and group B were 58.06% vs.79.64%,6.45% vs.16.07% and 54.83% vs.85.71% respectively with no significant difference.[Conclusions] The efficacy of sequential chemotherapy and boost IMRT is close to conventional sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy for NSCLC without increasing toxicity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Purpose] To compare the efficacy and toxicity of sequential chemotherapy and boost intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)with sequential chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)stage Ⅲ.[Methods] Eighty-seven cases of stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer were divided into 2 groups:group A and group B.Thirty-one cases of group A were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen 1~2 cycles,conventional radiotherapy 40Gy/20f,4W,and boost IMRT with a total dose of(70~74)Gy/(35~37)f,and after radiotherapy chemotherapy to be continued.Fifty-six cases of group B were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen and conventional radiotherapy with a total dose of(60~64)Gy/(30~32)f,(6~7)W.[Results] Eighty-seven cases followed up for 24 to 36 months.The overall response rate,1-and 2-year survival rates in group A and group B were 80.65% vs.76.56%,51.61% vs.35.71% and 35.48% vs.17.86% respectively with no significant difference.The radiation esophagitis,radiation pneumonitis and myelosuppression in group A and group B were 58.06% vs.79.64%,6.45% vs.16.07% and 54.83% vs.85.71% respectively with no significant difference.[Conclusions] The efficacy of sequential chemotherapy and boost IMRT is close to conventional sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy for NSCLC without increasing toxicity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Purpose] To compare the efficacy and toxicity of sequential chemotherapy and boost intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)with sequential chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)stage Ⅲ.[Methods] Eighty-seven cases of stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer were divided into 2 groups:group A and group B.Thirty-one cases of group A were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen 1~2 cycles,conventional radiotherapy 40Gy/20f,4W,and boost IMRT with a total dose of(70~74)Gy/(35~37)f,and after radiotherapy chemotherapy to be continued.Fifty-six cases of group B were treated with sequential vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen and conventional radiotherapy with a total dose of(60~64)Gy/(30~32)f,(6~7)W.[Results] Eighty-seven cases followed up for 24 to 36 months.The overall response rate,1-and 2-year survival rates in group A and group B were 80.65% vs.76.56%,51.61% vs.35.71% and 35.48% vs.17.86% respectively with no significant difference.The radiation esophagitis,radiation pneumonitis and myelosuppression in group A and group B were 58.06% vs.79.64%,6.45% vs.16.07% and 54.83% vs.85.71% respectively with no significant difference.[Conclusions] The efficacy of sequential chemotherapy and boost IMRT is close to conventional sequential radiotherapy and chemotherapy for NSCLC without increasing toxicity.

Key concepts: Medicine, Vinorelbine, Radiation therapy, Chemotherapy, Regimen, Lung cancer, Stage (stratigraphy), Esophagitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sequential Chemotherapy and Boost Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for 31 Cases with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III — Research Paper | ScholarLens