2007Unpublished venueRequires access

The clinical observation of gemcitabine or vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Gong Xian-qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy,toxicity and side effects of gemcitable or vinorelbine cominld with cisplation in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Total of 80 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed by pathology or cytology were enrolled into two groups randomly, 40 in each group . Group gemcitabine with 40 patients received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80mg/m2 on d1,d3; group vinorelbine received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on d1,d3. Both regiments had 21 days for each cycle, three weeks repeated and the efficacy was observed after 3 periods. Results: The effective rates of group gemcitabine and vinorelbine were 47.5% (19/40) and 45.0%(18/40) respectively, there was no significant difference (P0.05) between two groups. The median ailment development time were 4.9 and 4.1 months for group gemcitabine and vinorelbine ,respectively and there was sfafastic difference (P0.05). The 1-year survival rates were 42.5% for group gemcitabine and 40.0% for group vinorelbine, no significant difference (P0.05).Thrombocytopenia with group gemcitabine was higher than that of group vinorelbine but the leucopenian and alopecia and phlebitis in group gemcitabine were apparently lower than that in group vinorelbine. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between group gemcitabine and vinorelbine on efficacy ,median survival time and 1-year survival rate ,but there was a little advantage in group gemcitabine on median ailment development time. Both regimens are effective and well tolerated for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe the efficacy,toxicity and side effects of gemcitable or vinorelbine cominld with cisplation in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Total of 80 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed by pathology or cytology were enrolled into two groups randomly, 40 in each group . Group gemcitabine with 40 patients received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80mg/m2 on d1,d3; group vinorelbine received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on d1,d3. Both regiments had 21 days for each cycle, three weeks repeated and the efficacy was observed after 3 periods. Results: The effective rates of group gemcitabine and vinorelbine were 47.5% (19/40) and 45.0%(18/40) respectively, there was no significant difference (P0.05) between two groups. The median ailment development time were 4.9 and 4.1 months for group gemcitabine and vinorelbine ,respectively and there was sfafastic difference (P0.05). The 1-year survival rates were 42.5% for group gemcitabine and 40.0% for group vinorelbine, no significant difference (P0.05).Thrombocytopenia with group gemcitabine was higher than that of group vinorelbine but the leucopenian and alopecia and phlebitis in group gemcitabine were apparently lower than that in group vinorelbine. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between group gemcitabine and vinorelbine on efficacy ,median survival time and 1-year survival rate ,but there was a little advantage in group gemcitabine on median ailment development time. Both regimens are effective and well tolerated for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe the efficacy,toxicity and side effects of gemcitable or vinorelbine cominld with cisplation in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Total of 80 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed by pathology or cytology were enrolled into two groups randomly, 40 in each group . Group gemcitabine with 40 patients received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80mg/m2 on d1,d3; group vinorelbine received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on d1,8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on d1,d3. Both regiments had 21 days for each cycle, three weeks repeated and the efficacy was observed after 3 periods. Results: The effective rates of group gemcitabine and vinorelbine were 47.5% (19/40) and 45.0%(18/40) respectively, there was no significant difference (P0.05) between two groups. The median ailment development time were 4.9 and 4.1 months for group gemcitabine and vinorelbine ,respectively and there was sfafastic difference (P0.05). The 1-year survival rates were 42.5% for group gemcitabine and 40.0% for group vinorelbine, no significant difference (P0.05).Thrombocytopenia with group gemcitabine was higher than that of group vinorelbine but the leucopenian and alopecia and phlebitis in group gemcitabine were apparently lower than that in group vinorelbine. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between group gemcitabine and vinorelbine on efficacy ,median survival time and 1-year survival rate ,but there was a little advantage in group gemcitabine on median ailment development time. Both regimens are effective and well tolerated for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Key concepts: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Medicine, Internal medicine, Lung cancer, Cisplatin, Chemotherapy, Oncology

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical observation of gemcitabine or vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens