2011Jianzhu jiegou xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of collapse-resistant capacities of RC frames with seismic fortification categories B and C

Xinzheng Lu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

According to the GB 50011—2001'Code for seismic design of buildings',10 typical reinforced concrete(RC) frames were designed with different seismic fortification levels(from 6 to 8.5) and different fortification categories(B and C).The collapse resistances of the frames were evaluated quantitatively with collapse fragility analysis that was based on incremental dynamic analysis(IDA).The collapse resistances of frames with seismic fortification categories B and C were compared.The results show that the collapse resistances of structures should be evaluated in accordance with both the actual seismic resistance and the corresponding design intensity.For frames with seismic fortification level 6 to 7.5,since their actual aseismic resistances are relatively weak,their collapse resistances are insufficient when their seismic fortification categories are upgraded from B to C.So further measures are needed to enhance these structures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to the GB 50011—2001'Code for seismic design of buildings',10 typical reinforced concrete(RC) frames were designed with different seismic fortification levels(from 6 to 8.5) and different fortification categories(B and C).The collapse resistances of the frames were evaluated quantitatively with collapse fragility analysis that was based on incremental dynamic analysis(IDA).The collapse resistances of frames with seismic fortification categories B and C were compared.The results show that the collapse resistances of structures should be evaluated in accordance with both the actual seismic resistance and the corresponding design intensity.For frames with seismic fortification level 6 to 7.5,since their actual aseismic resistances are relatively weak,their collapse resistances are insufficient when their seismic fortification categories are upgraded from B to C.So further measures are needed to enhance these structures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to the GB 50011—2001'Code for seismic design of buildings',10 typical reinforced concrete(RC) frames were designed with different seismic fortification levels(from 6 to 8.5) and different fortification categories(B and C).The collapse resistances of the frames were evaluated quantitatively with collapse fragility analysis that was based on incremental dynamic analysis(IDA).The collapse resistances of frames with seismic fortification categories B and C were compared.The results show that the collapse resistances of structures should be evaluated in accordance with both the actual seismic resistance and the corresponding design intensity.For frames with seismic fortification level 6 to 7.5,since their actual aseismic resistances are relatively weak,their collapse resistances are insufficient when their seismic fortification categories are upgraded from B to C.So further measures are needed to enhance these structures.

Key concepts: Fragility, Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Seismic resistance, Seismic analysis, Structural engineering, Fortification, Seismic loading, Earthquake resistance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of collapse-resistant capacities of RC frames with seismic fortification categories B and C — Research Paper | ScholarLens