2014Journal of Fishery Sciences of ChinaRequires access

Morphometric variations analysis of Cyprinus carpio var. jian, Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus and the reciprocal F_1 hybrids (Cyprinus carpio var. jian♀×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♂, Cyprinus carpio var. jian♂×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♀)

Bin Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The morphological variations between common carp Cyprinus carpio var. jian, Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus and the reciprocal F1 hybrids(Cyprinus carpio var. jian♀×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♂, and Cyprinus carpio var. jian♂×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♀) were studied by variance analysis and by three methods of multivariate analysis, based on their morphological characters. There were no significant differences among four groups based on the number of scales on the lateral line, scales above the lateral line, scales beneath the lateral line, spines of pectoral fins and ventral fin(P0.05) except for the number of spines of the dorsal fin, anal fin, and soft rays of the dorsal fin, anal fin, ventral fin and pectoral fins. The cluster results showed that the morphological traits were similar between the parent fish stocks, but quite different from those of the reciprocal F1 hybrids. The discriminant functions of the four stocks were established, and the discriminatory accuracies were 76.7%–96.7%(P1)and 85.2%–90.6%(P2).The total discriminatory accuracy was 87.5%. In the principal component analysis, nine principal components were constructed, and the cumulative contributory ratio was 68.94%. The study would be beneficial for identifying groups, and for determining genetic relationships and breeding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The morphological variations between common carp Cyprinus carpio var. jian, Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus and the reciprocal F1 hybrids(Cyprinus carpio var. jian♀×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♂, and Cyprinus carpio var. jian♂×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♀) were studied by variance analysis and by three methods of multivariate analysis, based on their morphological characters. There were no significant differences among four groups based on the number of scales on the lateral line, scales above the lateral line, scales beneath the lateral line, spines of pectoral fins and ventral fin(P0.05) except for the number of spines of the dorsal fin, anal fin, and soft rays of the dorsal fin, anal fin, ventral fin and pectoral fins. The cluster results showed that the morphological traits were similar between the parent fish stocks, but quite different from those of the reciprocal F1 hybrids. The discriminant functions of the four stocks were established, and the discriminatory accuracies were 76.7%–96.7%(P1)and 85.2%–90.6%(P2).The total discriminatory accuracy was 87.5%. In the principal component analysis, nine principal components were constructed, and the cumulative contributory ratio was 68.94%. The study would be beneficial for identifying groups, and for determining genetic relationships and breeding.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The morphological variations between common carp Cyprinus carpio var. jian, Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus and the reciprocal F1 hybrids(Cyprinus carpio var. jian♀×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♂, and Cyprinus carpio var. jian♂×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♀) were studied by variance analysis and by three methods of multivariate analysis, based on their morphological characters. There were no significant differences among four groups based on the number of scales on the lateral line, scales above the lateral line, scales beneath the lateral line, spines of pectoral fins and ventral fin(P0.05) except for the number of spines of the dorsal fin, anal fin, and soft rays of the dorsal fin, anal fin, ventral fin and pectoral fins. The cluster results showed that the morphological traits were similar between the parent fish stocks, but quite different from those of the reciprocal F1 hybrids. The discriminant functions of the four stocks were established, and the discriminatory accuracies were 76.7%–96.7%(P1)and 85.2%–90.6%(P2).The total discriminatory accuracy was 87.5%. In the principal component analysis, nine principal components were constructed, and the cumulative contributory ratio was 68.94%. The study would be beneficial for identifying groups, and for determining genetic relationships and breeding.

Key concepts: Cyprinus, Common carp, Dorsal fin, Biology, Hybrid, Fish fin, Carp, Fishery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Morphometric variations analysis of Cyprinus carpio var. jian, Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus and the reciprocal F_1 hybrids (Cyprinus carpio var. jian♀×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♂, Cyprinus carpio var. jian♂×Cyprinus carpio haermatopterus♀) — Research Paper | ScholarLens