2005Journal of Clinical Laboratory ScienceRequires access

The methodological assessment of turbidimetry and nephelometry in immunoassay for serum immunoglobulins

Niu Hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the outcome bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry in immunoassay for serum immunoglobulins.Methods According to the profile NCCLS-EP9-A,two different methods,nephelometry (as test method) and turbidimetry (as comparative method),were used for immunoassay of IgA,IgG and IgM.The correlation of obtained data was analyzed and the outcome bias between the two methods was assessed.Results The outcome bias between the two methods for IgA and IgG at various concentrations was acceptable.The outcome bias for IgM was also acceptable at all the concentrations except for 1.0 g/L.Conclusion The bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry for immunoassay of serum IgA, IgG and IgM was acceptable providing the automatic biochemical analyzer and the matching reagent are used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the outcome bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry in immunoassay for serum immunoglobulins.Methods According to the profile NCCLS-EP9-A,two different methods,nephelometry (as test method) and turbidimetry (as comparative method),were used for immunoassay of IgA,IgG and IgM.The correlation of obtained data was analyzed and the outcome bias between the two methods was assessed.Results The outcome bias between the two methods for IgA and IgG at various concentrations was acceptable.The outcome bias for IgM was also acceptable at all the concentrations except for 1.0 g/L.Conclusion The bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry for immunoassay of serum IgA, IgG and IgM was acceptable providing the automatic biochemical analyzer and the matching reagent are used.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the outcome bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry in immunoassay for serum immunoglobulins.Methods According to the profile NCCLS-EP9-A,two different methods,nephelometry (as test method) and turbidimetry (as comparative method),were used for immunoassay of IgA,IgG and IgM.The correlation of obtained data was analyzed and the outcome bias between the two methods was assessed.Results The outcome bias between the two methods for IgA and IgG at various concentrations was acceptable.The outcome bias for IgM was also acceptable at all the concentrations except for 1.0 g/L.Conclusion The bias between turbidimetry and nephelometry for immunoassay of serum IgA, IgG and IgM was acceptable providing the automatic biochemical analyzer and the matching reagent are used.

Key concepts: Nephelometry, Turbidimetry, Immunoassay, Antibody, Chromatography, Chemistry, Immunology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The methodological assessment of turbidimetry and nephelometry in immunoassay for serum immunoglobulins — Research Paper | ScholarLens