2010Chinese Remedies & ClinicsRequires access

Effects of taurine on the learning and memory capacities in Manganese poisoned rats

Guo Song-cha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the protective and therapeutic effects of taurine on the learning and memory capacities in Manganese (Mn) poisoned rats. Methods One hundred healthy male SD rats in comparable weights were randomized into 5 groups: the 24-week control group (Group A), 24-week taurine treatment group (Group B), 12-week Mn-stained group (Group C), 12-week control group (Group D) and 12-week taurine prevention group (Group E) to receive interventions accordingly. After the interventions, each rat was assessed in a one-week study with navigation test for learning and memory capacities. Results The mean escape latency showed an overall downward trend. After a 2- day adaptation training, the mean escape latency appeared varied across all groups on days 3 and 4, significantly longer in Group C (29, 25)s than in Groups D (17, 14)s and E (16, 13)s, and in Group A (41, 35)s than in Group C. From day 5 onwards, each group showed slower change in mean escape latency. On a daily basis of observation, Groups D and E seemed comparable to each other, while Groups A and B showed basically longer mean escape latency compared with the other 3 groups. Conclusion Manganese staining can be hazardous to learning and memory capacities of rats. In contrast, taurine intervention may be beneficial, suggesting an antagonistic role of taurine against neuro- toxicity by Manganese. In addition, age may be an influencing factor for test outcome in the rats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the protective and therapeutic effects of taurine on the learning and memory capacities in Manganese (Mn) poisoned rats. Methods One hundred healthy male SD rats in comparable weights were randomized into 5 groups: the 24-week control group (Group A), 24-week taurine treatment group (Group B), 12-week Mn-stained group (Group C), 12-week control group (Group D) and 12-week taurine prevention group (Group E) to receive interventions accordingly. After the interventions, each rat was assessed in a one-week study with navigation test for learning and memory capacities. Results The mean escape latency showed an overall downward trend. After a 2- day adaptation training, the mean escape latency appeared varied across all groups on days 3 and 4, significantly longer in Group C (29, 25)s than in Groups D (17, 14)s and E (16, 13)s, and in Group A (41, 35)s than in Group C. From day 5 onwards, each group showed slower change in mean escape latency. On a daily basis of observation, Groups D and E seemed comparable to each other, while Groups A and B showed basically longer mean escape latency compared with the other 3 groups. Conclusion Manganese staining can be hazardous to learning and memory capacities of rats. In contrast, taurine intervention may be beneficial, suggesting an antagonistic role of taurine against neuro- toxicity by Manganese. In addition, age may be an influencing factor for test outcome in the rats.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the protective and therapeutic effects of taurine on the learning and memory capacities in Manganese (Mn) poisoned rats. Methods One hundred healthy male SD rats in comparable weights were randomized into 5 groups: the 24-week control group (Group A), 24-week taurine treatment group (Group B), 12-week Mn-stained group (Group C), 12-week control group (Group D) and 12-week taurine prevention group (Group E) to receive interventions accordingly. After the interventions, each rat was assessed in a one-week study with navigation test for learning and memory capacities. Results The mean escape latency showed an overall downward trend. After a 2- day adaptation training, the mean escape latency appeared varied across all groups on days 3 and 4, significantly longer in Group C (29, 25)s than in Groups D (17, 14)s and E (16, 13)s, and in Group A (41, 35)s than in Group C. From day 5 onwards, each group showed slower change in mean escape latency. On a daily basis of observation, Groups D and E seemed comparable to each other, while Groups A and B showed basically longer mean escape latency compared with the other 3 groups. Conclusion Manganese staining can be hazardous to learning and memory capacities of rats. In contrast, taurine intervention may be beneficial, suggesting an antagonistic role of taurine against neuro- toxicity by Manganese. In addition, age may be an influencing factor for test outcome in the rats.

Key concepts: Taurine, Latency (audio), Manganese, Medicine, Internal medicine, Psychology, Endocrinology, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of taurine on the learning and memory capacities in Manganese poisoned rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens