On the Harmonized Application of the Provision of Limited Criminal Responsibility Subject
Lin Sheng Wei
Abstract
Lin Sheng Wei
Abstract
Based on several legislative and judicial interpretations of sub-article 2 of article 17 of the criminal law, the article focuses on the application problems of this article with raising some warming debate issues and problems, solving those kinds of difficult issues by harmonized use of the principals of substantial and formally rationality. Also, this article makes a deeply analyse on the relationship between the recent relative criminal judicial interpretation and legislative interpretation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Based on several legislative and judicial interpretations of sub-article 2 of article 17 of the criminal law, the article focuses on the application problems of this article with raising some warming debate issues and problems, solving those kinds of difficult issues by harmonized use of the principals of substantial and formally rationality. Also, this article makes a deeply analyse on the relationship between the recent relative criminal judicial interpretation and legislative interpretation.
Key concepts: Legislature, Judicial interpretation, Interpretation (philosophy), Subject (documents), Rationality, Criminal law, Political science, Raising (metalworking)