The relative bioavailability of rifampicin of compound isoniazid capsules in dogs
Zhou Gang
Abstract
Zhou Gang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the relative bioavailability of rifampicin of compound isoniazid capsules in dogs.METHODS Six dogs were enrolled in a randomized crossover study with a single oral dose of the two formulations respectively.The rifampicin in plasma was measured by HPLC.RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference preparation for rifampicin were: t_max(3.8±1.7) and(3.3±0.8) h,C_max(38.8±10.9) and(37.8±9.1) mg·L~-1,AUC_0→∞(583.2±188.5) and(583.7±200.9) mg·h·L~-1,AUC_0→∞(605.1±197.2) and (596.4±202.1) mg·h·L~-1, t_1/2(9.5±1.5) and(9.1±1.4)h,F(102.8±17.3) %. CONCLUSION The results of the statistical analysis show that the two rifampicin preparations are bioequivalent.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE To study the relative bioavailability of rifampicin of compound isoniazid capsules in dogs.METHODS Six dogs were enrolled in a randomized crossover study with a single oral dose of the two formulations respectively.The rifampicin in plasma was measured by HPLC.RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference preparation for rifampicin were: t_max(3.8±1.7) and(3.3±0.8) h,C_max(38.8±10.9) and(37.8±9.1) mg·L~-1,AUC_0→∞(583.2±188.5) and(583.7±200.9) mg·h·L~-1,AUC_0→∞(605.1±197.2) and (596.4±202.1) mg·h·L~-1, t_1/2(9.5±1.5) and(9.1±1.4)h,F(102.8±17.3) %. CONCLUSION The results of the statistical analysis show that the two rifampicin preparations are bioequivalent.
Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Rifampicin, Bioavailability, Isoniazid, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Crossover study, Chemistry