2011•The Orthopedic Journal of ChinaRequires access

A comparative study of dynamic hip screw and locking comprass plate in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures

Xiao-wei Luo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Objective]To compare the therapeutic effect on femoral intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and locking comprass plate(LCP).[Method]A retrospective study of 90 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in of 458 hospital from March 2005 to December 2008 was carried out.46 patients were treated with DHS,and 44 with LCP.The operative time,blood loss,walking time,union time and hip function scores were recorded and statistically analyzed.[Result]All the patients were followed up for 6-18 months(mean,12.8 months in average).Operative time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.0002).Blood loss in the LCP group was less than that of DHS group(P≈0.0006).Walking time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.001).There was no significant difference in union time(P≈0.082)between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the excellent and good results between the two groups in stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.064)either.The excellent and good results of LCP group was significantly higher than DHS group in unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.0001).[Conclusion]Both technigues have their own advantages and indications.They are both effective for stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.LCP has more advantages and indications for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Objective]To compare the therapeutic effect on femoral intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and locking comprass plate(LCP).[Method]A retrospective study of 90 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in of 458 hospital from March 2005 to December 2008 was carried out.46 patients were treated with DHS,and 44 with LCP.The operative time,blood loss,walking time,union time and hip function scores were recorded and statistically analyzed.[Result]All the patients were followed up for 6-18 months(mean,12.8 months in average).Operative time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.0002).Blood loss in the LCP group was less than that of DHS group(P≈0.0006).Walking time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.001).There was no significant difference in union time(P≈0.082)between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the excellent and good results between the two groups in stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.064)either.The excellent and good results of LCP group was significantly higher than DHS group in unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.0001).[Conclusion]Both technigues have their own advantages and indications.They are both effective for stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.LCP has more advantages and indications for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Objective]To compare the therapeutic effect on femoral intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw(DHS) and locking comprass plate(LCP).[Method]A retrospective study of 90 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in of 458 hospital from March 2005 to December 2008 was carried out.46 patients were treated with DHS,and 44 with LCP.The operative time,blood loss,walking time,union time and hip function scores were recorded and statistically analyzed.[Result]All the patients were followed up for 6-18 months(mean,12.8 months in average).Operative time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.0002).Blood loss in the LCP group was less than that of DHS group(P≈0.0006).Walking time in the LCP group was shorter than that of DHS group(P≈0.001).There was no significant difference in union time(P≈0.082)between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the excellent and good results between the two groups in stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.064)either.The excellent and good results of LCP group was significantly higher than DHS group in unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures(P≈0.0001).[Conclusion]Both technigues have their own advantages and indications.They are both effective for stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.LCP has more advantages and indications for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dynamic hip screw, Surgery, Blood loss, Intertrochanteric fracture, Significant difference, Femur, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of dynamic hip screw and locking comprass plate in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens