2005•Journal of Sichuan UniversityRequires access

Restudying the Legal Status of Audio-visual Materials

Zhang Bin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There has always been dispute between two opinions of regarding audio-visual as an of evidence and as a of evidence.To solve this dispute,we must firstly have clear recognition of the scope of audio-visual materials.From the angles of semantic analysis and legislative study,audio-visual materials include sound-recording evidence,video and computer evidence.The dispute between independent category and non-independent category can be thought to be question of whether audio-visual materials can be classified into documentary evidence.It is to some extent reasonable to classify sound-recording evidence,video and computer into documentary evidence,but this is not practical in the context of our country.To clarify the legal status of audio-visual materials is helpful for the establishment of the evidentiary rules governing the use of audio-visual materials and the procedure and approaches of evidentiary investigation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There has always been dispute between two opinions of regarding audio-visual as an of evidence and as a of evidence.To solve this dispute,we must firstly have clear recognition of the scope of audio-visual materials.From the angles of semantic analysis and legislative study,audio-visual materials include sound-recording evidence,video and computer evidence.The dispute between independent category and non-independent category can be thought to be question of whether audio-visual materials can be classified into documentary evidence.It is to some extent reasonable to classify sound-recording evidence,video and computer into documentary evidence,but this is not practical in the context of our country.To clarify the legal status of audio-visual materials is helpful for the establishment of the evidentiary rules governing the use of audio-visual materials and the procedure and approaches of evidentiary investigation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There has always been dispute between two opinions of regarding audio-visual as an of evidence and as a of evidence.To solve this dispute,we must firstly have clear recognition of the scope of audio-visual materials.From the angles of semantic analysis and legislative study,audio-visual materials include sound-recording evidence,video and computer evidence.The dispute between independent category and non-independent category can be thought to be question of whether audio-visual materials can be classified into documentary evidence.It is to some extent reasonable to classify sound-recording evidence,video and computer into documentary evidence,but this is not practical in the context of our country.To clarify the legal status of audio-visual materials is helpful for the establishment of the evidentiary rules governing the use of audio-visual materials and the procedure and approaches of evidentiary investigation.

Key concepts: Audio visual, Scope (computer science), Context (archaeology), Computer science, Cognitive psychology, Psychology, Multimedia, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Restudying the Legal Status of Audio-visual Materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens