2004Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Study on bioequivalence of three kinds of loratadine preparations

Mao Guo-guang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the bioequivalence of three kinds of loratadine preparations in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single oral dose of loratadine of reference or test preparations 40 mg was given to healthy male volunteers according to an open randomized three cross-over design. The plasma concentrations of loratadine were determined by a RP-HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of two test prepartions were compared with reference preparation. RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: T_ max were (1.0±s 0.5), (1.0±0.4) and (0.9±0.3)h; C_ max were (36±15), (37±16) and (36±15) μg·L -1; T_ 1/2 were (3.5±1.0), (3.6±0.8) and (3.7±1.0)h; AUC_ 0-12 were (109±46), (110±51), and (108±46) μg·h·L -1; AUC_ 0~∞ were ( 118±50), (120±54), and (119±51)μg·h·L -1; The relative bioavailability of two test preparations reference preparation were (101±12)% and (101±14)%. CONCLUSION: The two test preparations and the reference preparation are bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the bioequivalence of three kinds of loratadine preparations in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single oral dose of loratadine of reference or test preparations 40 mg was given to healthy male volunteers according to an open randomized three cross-over design. The plasma concentrations of loratadine were determined by a RP-HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of two test prepartions were compared with reference preparation. RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: T_ max were (1.0±s 0.5), (1.0±0.4) and (0.9±0.3)h; C_ max were (36±15), (37±16) and (36±15) μg·L -1; T_ 1/2 were (3.5±1.0), (3.6±0.8) and (3.7±1.0)h; AUC_ 0-12 were (109±46), (110±51), and (108±46) μg·h·L -1; AUC_ 0~∞ were ( 118±50), (120±54), and (119±51)μg·h·L -1; The relative bioavailability of two test preparations reference preparation were (101±12)% and (101±14)%. CONCLUSION: The two test preparations and the reference preparation are bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the bioequivalence of three kinds of loratadine preparations in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single oral dose of loratadine of reference or test preparations 40 mg was given to healthy male volunteers according to an open randomized three cross-over design. The plasma concentrations of loratadine were determined by a RP-HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of two test prepartions were compared with reference preparation. RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: T_ max were (1.0±s 0.5), (1.0±0.4) and (0.9±0.3)h; C_ max were (36±15), (37±16) and (36±15) μg·L -1; T_ 1/2 were (3.5±1.0), (3.6±0.8) and (3.7±1.0)h; AUC_ 0-12 were (109±46), (110±51), and (108±46) μg·h·L -1; AUC_ 0~∞ were ( 118±50), (120±54), and (119±51)μg·h·L -1; The relative bioavailability of two test preparations reference preparation were (101±12)% and (101±14)%. CONCLUSION: The two test preparations and the reference preparation are bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Loratadine, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Chromatography, Plasma concentration, Desloratadine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on bioequivalence of three kinds of loratadine preparations — Research Paper | ScholarLens