The Application of AHP in the Systematic Construction of Intellectual Mansion
Chen Ben-yan
Abstract
Chen Ben-yan
Abstract
The AHP has been used to solve the analytic problem about the multi-goal investment decision of the systematic construction of intellectual mansion in the thesis. Through overall and comprehensive narration and analyses about structure , system , service , operation in the intellectual mansion system and the relations among them,six pieces of appraisal criterion are chosen to A,B,C three design plans, and the system of level index is established according to the AHP. Through the survey about users and experts' opinions and comparations among each two sub-goals that presuppose the relative general goal ,the comparative matrix is worked out.The weight in the standard level can be losted as(D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6)=(0.168,0.189,0.187,0.05,0.15,0.256)T,by the calculation of weight ,and the weight order of the relative general goal in scheme level is.From the result of calculation it can be found that the heaviest weight is scheme B ,next is scheme A then scheme C. All judged matrix meet the consistency demand , and the rate of error is less than 0.1.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The AHP has been used to solve the analytic problem about the multi-goal investment decision of the systematic construction of intellectual mansion in the thesis. Through overall and comprehensive narration and analyses about structure , system , service , operation in the intellectual mansion system and the relations among them,six pieces of appraisal criterion are chosen to A,B,C three design plans, and the system of level index is established according to the AHP. Through the survey about users and experts' opinions and comparations among each two sub-goals that presuppose the relative general goal ,the comparative matrix is worked out.The weight in the standard level can be losted as(D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6)=(0.168,0.189,0.187,0.05,0.15,0.256)T,by the calculation of weight ,and the weight order of the relative general goal in scheme level is.From the result of calculation it can be found that the heaviest weight is scheme B ,next is scheme A then scheme C. All judged matrix meet the consistency demand , and the rate of error is less than 0.1.
Key concepts: Analytic hierarchy process, Consistency (knowledge bases), Order (exchange), Scheme (mathematics), Investment (military), Service (business), Matrix (chemical analysis), Index (typography)