ScholarLens Back to search
2005•China Medical EngineeringRequires access

Limited fluid resuscitation after uncontrolled hemorrhagic traumatic shock

Yuan Le

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of limited fluid resuscitation in a mode of uncontrolled hemorrhagic traumatic shock. [Method] 134 patients were retrospectively analyzed and compare healing rate,incidence of MODS and ARDS and mortality rate between regular fluid resuscitation group(n=78) and limited fluid resuscitation group (n=56). [Result] Survival rate of regular fluid resuscitation group was 61.5 percent .Mortality rate was 38.5%. Incidence of MODS was 36.0%. Incidence of ARDS was 25.6 %. Survival rate of limited fluid resuscitation group was 78.6 %.Mortality rate was 21.4%. Incidence of MODS was 18.9 %. Incidence of ARDS was 9.0%. It was significance between two groops (P 0.05). [Conclusion] Limited fluid resuscitation is more rational to improve the prognosis in case with uncontrolled traumatic shock than regular fluid resuscitation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the effect of limited fluid resuscitation in a mode of uncontrolled hemorrhagic traumatic shock. [Method] 134 patients were retrospectively analyzed and compare healing rate,incidence of MODS and ARDS and mortality rate between regular fluid resuscitation group(n=78) and limited fluid resuscitation group (n=56). [Result] Survival rate of regular fluid resuscitation group was 61.5 percent .Mortality rate was 38.5%. Incidence of MODS was 36.0%. Incidence of ARDS was 25.6 %. Survival rate of limited fluid resuscitation group was 78.6 %.Mortality rate was 21.4%. Incidence of MODS was 18.9 %. Incidence of ARDS was 9.0%. It was significance between two groops (P 0.05). [Conclusion] Limited fluid resuscitation is more rational to improve the prognosis in case with uncontrolled traumatic shock than regular fluid resuscitation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the effect of limited fluid resuscitation in a mode of uncontrolled hemorrhagic traumatic shock. [Method] 134 patients were retrospectively analyzed and compare healing rate,incidence of MODS and ARDS and mortality rate between regular fluid resuscitation group(n=78) and limited fluid resuscitation group (n=56). [Result] Survival rate of regular fluid resuscitation group was 61.5 percent .Mortality rate was 38.5%. Incidence of MODS was 36.0%. Incidence of ARDS was 25.6 %. Survival rate of limited fluid resuscitation group was 78.6 %.Mortality rate was 21.4%. Incidence of MODS was 18.9 %. Incidence of ARDS was 9.0%. It was significance between two groops (P 0.05). [Conclusion] Limited fluid resuscitation is more rational to improve the prognosis in case with uncontrolled traumatic shock than regular fluid resuscitation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Resuscitation, ARDS, Incidence (geometry), Shock (circulatory), Traumatic Shock, Anesthesia, Mortality rate

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Limited fluid resuscitation after uncontrolled hemorrhagic traumatic shock — Research Paper | ScholarLens