2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of trigeminal neurinoma

Jiang Wei-xi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo report the experience of diagnosis and microsurgical treatment of patients with trigeminal neurinoma. MethodsThe clinical manifestations, preoperative CT and MRI features, operative techniques, and outcome of 13 patients with trigeminal neurinoma were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe most frequent symptoms were either pain or numbness of the ipsilateral, which was due to the dysfunction of the trigeminal nerve. CT and MRI were the major means for diagnosis of the lesions. Five patients had tumors limited to the middle cranial fossa, 8 patients had dumbbell shaped tumors which extended into both the middle and posterior cranial fossa. Postoperatively, 12 of the 13 patients had either stable or improved function of cranial nerves compared with their preoperative status, and the other one worsened. Total resection of tumor was accomplished by extradural approach in 11 patients. Subtotal removal were achieved in 2 patients. None of the patients had new cranial nerves deficits after the operation. There were no perioperative deaths. Ten patients were followed-up, ranging from 6 to 36 months. None recurred. ConclusionMRI is considered the best method for diagnosing the trigeminal neuromas. It is suggested that trigeminal neuromas, either in the middle cranial fossa or both in the middle and posterior fossa, can be safely and radically removed by extradural approach, which can lead to lower morbidity and postoperative complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ObjectiveTo report the experience of diagnosis and microsurgical treatment of patients with trigeminal neurinoma. MethodsThe clinical manifestations, preoperative CT and MRI features, operative techniques, and outcome of 13 patients with trigeminal neurinoma were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe most frequent symptoms were either pain or numbness of the ipsilateral, which was due to the dysfunction of the trigeminal nerve. CT and MRI were the major means for diagnosis of the lesions. Five patients had tumors limited to the middle cranial fossa, 8 patients had dumbbell shaped tumors which extended into both the middle and posterior cranial fossa. Postoperatively, 12 of the 13 patients had either stable or improved function of cranial nerves compared with their preoperative status, and the other one worsened. Total resection of tumor was accomplished by extradural approach in 11 patients. Subtotal removal were achieved in 2 patients. None of the patients had new cranial nerves deficits after the operation. There were no perioperative deaths. Ten patients were followed-up, ranging from 6 to 36 months. None recurred. ConclusionMRI is considered the best method for diagnosing the trigeminal neuromas. It is suggested that trigeminal neuromas, either in the middle cranial fossa or both in the middle and posterior fossa, can be safely and radically removed by extradural approach, which can lead to lower morbidity and postoperative complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ObjectiveTo report the experience of diagnosis and microsurgical treatment of patients with trigeminal neurinoma. MethodsThe clinical manifestations, preoperative CT and MRI features, operative techniques, and outcome of 13 patients with trigeminal neurinoma were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe most frequent symptoms were either pain or numbness of the ipsilateral, which was due to the dysfunction of the trigeminal nerve. CT and MRI were the major means for diagnosis of the lesions. Five patients had tumors limited to the middle cranial fossa, 8 patients had dumbbell shaped tumors which extended into both the middle and posterior cranial fossa. Postoperatively, 12 of the 13 patients had either stable or improved function of cranial nerves compared with their preoperative status, and the other one worsened. Total resection of tumor was accomplished by extradural approach in 11 patients. Subtotal removal were achieved in 2 patients. None of the patients had new cranial nerves deficits after the operation. There were no perioperative deaths. Ten patients were followed-up, ranging from 6 to 36 months. None recurred. ConclusionMRI is considered the best method for diagnosing the trigeminal neuromas. It is suggested that trigeminal neuromas, either in the middle cranial fossa or both in the middle and posterior fossa, can be safely and radically removed by extradural approach, which can lead to lower morbidity and postoperative complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Trigeminal nerve, Posterior cranial fossa, Middle cranial fossa, Perioperative, Cranial nerves, Microsurgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnosis and surgical treatment of trigeminal neurinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens