2008•Yuyan yanjiuRequires access

A Study on the Sanskrit-Chinese Phonetic Transcriptions of the Dunhuang(敦煌) Fragment P.3861 in French Collection

Sun Bo-jun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The phonological rules of the Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcriptions of the Dunhuang(敦煌) fragment P.3861 in French collection reflect the Chinese Hexi(河西) dialect during the times when Dunhuang(敦煌) was captured by Tibetans in 8th and 9th century. The characteristics of that dialect, i. e., the distinction between the voiced and voiceless consonants being not so clear, some traces of the mmb, nnd,ηηg evolution being noticeable, the nasal ending-ηof the groups Dang(宕), Geng(梗) and Tong (通) being dropped, the vowel of the Group Dang(宕) being shifted, nasal endings -m, -n being disappeared, proves to be the same as the other fragments excavated at Dunhuang(敦煌) such as Qianziwen(千字文) and Kai Meng Yao Xun(开蒙要训). Contrasted to the phonetic rules of Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcription of XiXia dynasty in 12th, we can realize that Chinese dialect of XiXia was adapting to that of Dunhuang(敦煌).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The phonological rules of the Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcriptions of the Dunhuang(敦煌) fragment P.3861 in French collection reflect the Chinese Hexi(河西) dialect during the times when Dunhuang(敦煌) was captured by Tibetans in 8th and 9th century. The characteristics of that dialect, i. e., the distinction between the voiced and voiceless consonants being not so clear, some traces of the mmb, nnd,ηηg evolution being noticeable, the nasal ending-ηof the groups Dang(宕), Geng(梗) and Tong (通) being dropped, the vowel of the Group Dang(宕) being shifted, nasal endings -m, -n being disappeared, proves to be the same as the other fragments excavated at Dunhuang(敦煌) such as Qianziwen(千字文) and Kai Meng Yao Xun(开蒙要训). Contrasted to the phonetic rules of Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcription of XiXia dynasty in 12th, we can realize that Chinese dialect of XiXia was adapting to that of Dunhuang(敦煌).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The phonological rules of the Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcriptions of the Dunhuang(敦煌) fragment P.3861 in French collection reflect the Chinese Hexi(河西) dialect during the times when Dunhuang(敦煌) was captured by Tibetans in 8th and 9th century. The characteristics of that dialect, i. e., the distinction between the voiced and voiceless consonants being not so clear, some traces of the mmb, nnd,ηηg evolution being noticeable, the nasal ending-ηof the groups Dang(宕), Geng(梗) and Tong (通) being dropped, the vowel of the Group Dang(宕) being shifted, nasal endings -m, -n being disappeared, proves to be the same as the other fragments excavated at Dunhuang(敦煌) such as Qianziwen(千字文) and Kai Meng Yao Xun(开蒙要训). Contrasted to the phonetic rules of Sanskrit-Chinese phonetic transcription of XiXia dynasty in 12th, we can realize that Chinese dialect of XiXia was adapting to that of Dunhuang(敦煌).

Key concepts: Sanskrit, Vowel, Fragment (logic), Linguistics, Transcription (linguistics), History, Philosophy, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study on the Sanskrit-Chinese Phonetic Transcriptions of the Dunhuang(敦煌) Fragment P.3861 in French Collection — Research Paper | ScholarLens