2007•Zhongguo xiandai yixue/Zhongguo xiandai yixue zazhiRequires access

Comparision of remifentanil or fentanil in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy

LI De-long

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficiacy and safety of remifentanil with that of fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy under general anesthesia. Methods 70 ASAI~Ⅱ pediatric patients aged 1~5 years old undergoing palatorrhaphy were enrolled and randomized into remifentanil group(group R) and fentanyl group (group F). Each group consisted of 35 cases. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2.0 mg/kg),plus either remifentanil (1.5 μg/kg) or fentanyl (2.0 μg/kg),and maintained with inhalation of 0.75~1.0 vol% sevoflurane,plus a continous infusion of either remifentanil 0.20 μg/(kg·min) or fentanyl 0.08 μg/(kg·min). The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and recovery profile were compared. Results Hemodynamic values during induction,tracheal intubation and skin incision were significantly lower as compared with preoperative(P 0.01,P 0.05). HR was significantly lower at tracheal intubation,and higher at tracheal extubation in group R than those in group F(P 0.05). Quicker conscious recovery and less complications could be detected in group R in contrast with group F(P 0.05). Conclusions Remifentanil-based general anesthesia presents more safety and efficacy than fentanyl-based anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficiacy and safety of remifentanil with that of fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy under general anesthesia. Methods 70 ASAI~Ⅱ pediatric patients aged 1~5 years old undergoing palatorrhaphy were enrolled and randomized into remifentanil group(group R) and fentanyl group (group F). Each group consisted of 35 cases. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2.0 mg/kg),plus either remifentanil (1.5 μg/kg) or fentanyl (2.0 μg/kg),and maintained with inhalation of 0.75~1.0 vol% sevoflurane,plus a continous infusion of either remifentanil 0.20 μg/(kg·min) or fentanyl 0.08 μg/(kg·min). The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and recovery profile were compared. Results Hemodynamic values during induction,tracheal intubation and skin incision were significantly lower as compared with preoperative(P 0.01,P 0.05). HR was significantly lower at tracheal intubation,and higher at tracheal extubation in group R than those in group F(P 0.05). Quicker conscious recovery and less complications could be detected in group R in contrast with group F(P 0.05). Conclusions Remifentanil-based general anesthesia presents more safety and efficacy than fentanyl-based anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficiacy and safety of remifentanil with that of fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy under general anesthesia. Methods 70 ASAI~Ⅱ pediatric patients aged 1~5 years old undergoing palatorrhaphy were enrolled and randomized into remifentanil group(group R) and fentanyl group (group F). Each group consisted of 35 cases. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2.0 mg/kg),plus either remifentanil (1.5 μg/kg) or fentanyl (2.0 μg/kg),and maintained with inhalation of 0.75~1.0 vol% sevoflurane,plus a continous infusion of either remifentanil 0.20 μg/(kg·min) or fentanyl 0.08 μg/(kg·min). The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and recovery profile were compared. Results Hemodynamic values during induction,tracheal intubation and skin incision were significantly lower as compared with preoperative(P 0.01,P 0.05). HR was significantly lower at tracheal intubation,and higher at tracheal extubation in group R than those in group F(P 0.05). Quicker conscious recovery and less complications could be detected in group R in contrast with group F(P 0.05). Conclusions Remifentanil-based general anesthesia presents more safety and efficacy than fentanyl-based anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Fentanyl, Medicine, Anesthesia, Propofol, Tracheal intubation, Sevoflurane, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparision of remifentanil or fentanil in pediatric patients undergoing palatorrhaphy — Research Paper | ScholarLens