A Critique of Critiques:Utilitarianism's Refutation of John Rawls
Yao Da-zhi
Abstract
Yao Da-zhi
Abstract
In the 1970s, John Rawls and other philosophers criticized utilitarianism and overturned its position of domination. After that, the utilitarians made their responses to the critiques: David Lyons, David Gauthier and John C. Harsanyi separately made critiques of the three parts of John Rawls's theory of justice, which is the first principle of justice, the second principle of justice and the argument justifying the principles of justice. The paper discusses the utilitarians' critique of John Rawls.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the 1970s, John Rawls and other philosophers criticized utilitarianism and overturned its position of domination. After that, the utilitarians made their responses to the critiques: David Lyons, David Gauthier and John C. Harsanyi separately made critiques of the three parts of John Rawls's theory of justice, which is the first principle of justice, the second principle of justice and the argument justifying the principles of justice. The paper discusses the utilitarians' critique of John Rawls.
Key concepts: Utilitarianism, Original position, Primary goods, Economic Justice, Philosophy, Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Egalitarianism