2011Chinese Journal of New Clinical MedicineRequires access

The application of Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post in molar residual crown restoration

Jian Liang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the practical results of two post cores ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) through the methods of instantly restoring the residual crown and then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients with 130 tooth were randomly divided into two groups, every group was 65 tooth. Two methods ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) were used for restoring the molar residual crown respectively, and every group was treated through light-cure tetric ceram repairing the residual crown and then then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. The operation time and the success rate were compared. Results Two years follow-up showed,in the group of Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post three stainless steel post were curved and displaced, and the operation time was shorter than that of group of glass-fiber post ( P 0. 01) . But there was no statistical significance in the success rate between the two kinds of posts ( P 0. 05 ). Conclusion The anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and the glass-fiber post have similar curative effect. But the former which has advantages of special design, hard retainer, simple operation and lower cost, is worth popularizing and applying.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the practical results of two post cores ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) through the methods of instantly restoring the residual crown and then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients with 130 tooth were randomly divided into two groups, every group was 65 tooth. Two methods ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) were used for restoring the molar residual crown respectively, and every group was treated through light-cure tetric ceram repairing the residual crown and then then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. The operation time and the success rate were compared. Results Two years follow-up showed,in the group of Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post three stainless steel post were curved and displaced, and the operation time was shorter than that of group of glass-fiber post ( P 0. 01) . But there was no statistical significance in the success rate between the two kinds of posts ( P 0. 05 ). Conclusion The anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and the glass-fiber post have similar curative effect. But the former which has advantages of special design, hard retainer, simple operation and lower cost, is worth popularizing and applying.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the practical results of two post cores ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) through the methods of instantly restoring the residual crown and then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients with 130 tooth were randomly divided into two groups, every group was 65 tooth. Two methods ( Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and glass-fiber post) were used for restoring the molar residual crown respectively, and every group was treated through light-cure tetric ceram repairing the residual crown and then then restoring the residual crown for permanent ceramic crown. The operation time and the success rate were compared. Results Two years follow-up showed,in the group of Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post three stainless steel post were curved and displaced, and the operation time was shorter than that of group of glass-fiber post ( P 0. 01) . But there was no statistical significance in the success rate between the two kinds of posts ( P 0. 05 ). Conclusion The anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post and the glass-fiber post have similar curative effect. But the former which has advantages of special design, hard retainer, simple operation and lower cost, is worth popularizing and applying.

Key concepts: Root canal, Crown (dentistry), Retainer, Medicine, Dentistry, Residual, Molar, Glass fiber

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The application of Anthogyr root-canal stainless steel post in molar residual crown restoration — Research Paper | ScholarLens