2011Fazhi yu shehui fazhanRequires access

The Judicial Environment of Freedom of Contract:How Method of Law Saves Autonomy of Will

Hui Xie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Judges are traditionally regarded as subjects in the interpretation of law in contract judgment,and this pushes the principle of freedom of contract which is the spirit of contract law into a dangerous situation.Discarding the philosophical interpretation of methodology and saving autonomy of will by means of resetting subjects of interpretation,however,have difficulties in practice giving consideration to the beginnings and the end.The autonomy of will in private law judgment needs to be realized in the dimension of method of law,and judges are the only subjects of contract interpretation under the methodology.Judges have to be in the condition of judicial restraint under the restriction of source of law,discovery of law,interpretation of law and other methods of law.It's just this kind of restrained jurisdiction that grants autonomy of will the most possible living space.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judges are traditionally regarded as subjects in the interpretation of law in contract judgment,and this pushes the principle of freedom of contract which is the spirit of contract law into a dangerous situation.Discarding the philosophical interpretation of methodology and saving autonomy of will by means of resetting subjects of interpretation,however,have difficulties in practice giving consideration to the beginnings and the end.The autonomy of will in private law judgment needs to be realized in the dimension of method of law,and judges are the only subjects of contract interpretation under the methodology.Judges have to be in the condition of judicial restraint under the restriction of source of law,discovery of law,interpretation of law and other methods of law.It's just this kind of restrained jurisdiction that grants autonomy of will the most possible living space.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judges are traditionally regarded as subjects in the interpretation of law in contract judgment,and this pushes the principle of freedom of contract which is the spirit of contract law into a dangerous situation.Discarding the philosophical interpretation of methodology and saving autonomy of will by means of resetting subjects of interpretation,however,have difficulties in practice giving consideration to the beginnings and the end.The autonomy of will in private law judgment needs to be realized in the dimension of method of law,and judges are the only subjects of contract interpretation under the methodology.Judges have to be in the condition of judicial restraint under the restriction of source of law,discovery of law,interpretation of law and other methods of law.It's just this kind of restrained jurisdiction that grants autonomy of will the most possible living space.

Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Law, Autonomy, Judicial interpretation, Jurisdiction, Freedom of contract, Private law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Judicial Environment of Freedom of Contract:How Method of Law Saves Autonomy of Will — Research Paper | ScholarLens