Critique of "Chinese model"——Based on the Paradox of "Washington Consensus" and the sustainability of China's reforms and development

Nowadays,scholars home and abroad often use the term of Chinese model in their studies to summarize the and consensus of China's 30 years reforms and development.Historically speaking,however,experience will inevitably turn to be concretionary once it becomes a model.Therefore,Chinese model is neither an objective reflection to China's reality,nor a help to make long-term development.It will be rational to use the term of Chinese experience or Chinese route instead of Chinese model and make a comparative review of China's 30 years achievements and shortcomings to those in the first 30 years after the founding of New China.All these are of great strategic significance to a profound understanding of China's reality as well as further reforms and development.