2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Hermeneutics in medieval thought

Maurício Beuchot, Juan Tubert-Oklander

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Perhaps no other era has been as ‘hermeneutic’ as the Middle Ages – although this has not been widely acknowledged. The thought of the period was full of exegeses and commentaries, appearing in a wide variety of forms, and the Holy Scriptures were a focus for constant interpretation and re-interpretation. There is thus much that the era can teach us about hermeneutic practice. I shall consider the Middle Ages as divided into the High Middle Ages, theMature Middle Ages, and the Late Middle Ages. The High Middle Ages will be seen as preparatory to Scholasticism – the core of medieval thinking – the Mature Middle Ages as corresponding to its maturity, and the Late Middle Ages to its decadence. Yet although the scholastics dominate the thought of the Mature and Late Middle Ages, the High Middle Ages are ruled by the monastic, and this makes, as we shall see, for a profound difference.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Perhaps no other era has been as ‘hermeneutic’ as the Middle Ages – although this has not been widely acknowledged. The thought of the period was full of exegeses and commentaries, appearing in a wide variety of forms, and the Holy Scriptures were a focus for constant interpretation and re-interpretation. There is thus much that the era can teach us about hermeneutic practice. I shall consider the Middle Ages as divided into the High Middle Ages, theMature Middle Ages, and the Late Middle Ages. The High Middle Ages will be seen as preparatory to Scholasticism – the core of medieval thinking – the Mature Middle Ages as corresponding to its maturity, and the Late Middle Ages to its decadence. Yet although the scholastics dominate the thought of the Mature and Late Middle Ages, the High Middle Ages are ruled by the monastic, and this makes, as we shall see, for a profound difference.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Perhaps no other era has been as ‘hermeneutic’ as the Middle Ages – although this has not been widely acknowledged. The thought of the period was full of exegeses and commentaries, appearing in a wide variety of forms, and the Holy Scriptures were a focus for constant interpretation and re-interpretation. There is thus much that the era can teach us about hermeneutic practice. I shall consider the Middle Ages as divided into the High Middle Ages, theMature Middle Ages, and the Late Middle Ages. The High Middle Ages will be seen as preparatory to Scholasticism – the core of medieval thinking – the Mature Middle Ages as corresponding to its maturity, and the Late Middle Ages to its decadence. Yet although the scholastics dominate the thought of the Mature and Late Middle Ages, the High Middle Ages are ruled by the monastic, and this makes, as we shall see, for a profound difference.

Key concepts: Middle Ages, Scholasticism, Interpretation (philosophy), Decadence, Maturity (psychological), Period (music), Hermeneutics, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hermeneutics in medieval thought — Research Paper | ScholarLens