2007•PubMedRequires access

[Preliminary study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for recurrent cervical cancer].

Qi Zhou, Ying Margie Tang, Xiaolei Shu, Li Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Totally 21 patients with recurrent cervical cancer between April 2004 and January 2007 treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional external radiation therapy were evaluated. Twenty-one patients treated with IMRT was group A, and the other 18 patients with anterior posterior field radiotherapy was group B. Preliminary outcome and toxicity were evaluated between two groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the prescribed dose. Group A was (50 +/- 11) Gy and group B was (39 +/- 5) Gy. There were no significant differences in the two groups (P > 0.05). The effective rate of group A was 71% (15/21) and of group B 39% (7/18), with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). The average survival time of group A was (25 +/- 6) months, and of group B (12 +/- 5) months, with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). In group A, acute grade > or = 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and myelotoxicity were seen in 0, 0, and 2 patients, respectively. While in group B, these were seen in none. CONCLUSIONS: The curative effect of IMRT is better than anterior posterior field radiotherapy. The acute toxicity of IMRT is acceptable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Totally 21 patients with recurrent cervical cancer between April 2004 and January 2007 treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional external radiation therapy were evaluated. Twenty-one patients treated with IMRT was group A, and the other 18 patients with anterior posterior field radiotherapy was group B. Preliminary outcome and toxicity were evaluated between two groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the prescribed dose. Group A was (50 +/- 11) Gy and group B was (39 +/- 5) Gy. There were no significant differences in the two groups (P > 0.05). The effective rate of group A was 71% (15/21) and of group B 39% (7/18), with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). The average survival time of group A was (25 +/- 6) months, and of group B (12 +/- 5) months, with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). In group A, acute grade > or = 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and myelotoxicity were seen in 0, 0, and 2 patients, respectively. While in group B, these were seen in none. CONCLUSIONS: The curative effect of IMRT is better than anterior posterior field radiotherapy. The acute toxicity of IMRT is acceptable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Totally 21 patients with recurrent cervical cancer between April 2004 and January 2007 treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional external radiation therapy were evaluated. Twenty-one patients treated with IMRT was group A, and the other 18 patients with anterior posterior field radiotherapy was group B. Preliminary outcome and toxicity were evaluated between two groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the prescribed dose. Group A was (50 +/- 11) Gy and group B was (39 +/- 5) Gy. There were no significant differences in the two groups (P > 0.05). The effective rate of group A was 71% (15/21) and of group B 39% (7/18), with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). The average survival time of group A was (25 +/- 6) months, and of group B (12 +/- 5) months, with a significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.05). In group A, acute grade > or = 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and myelotoxicity were seen in 0, 0, and 2 patients, respectively. While in group B, these were seen in none. CONCLUSIONS: The curative effect of IMRT is better than anterior posterior field radiotherapy. The acute toxicity of IMRT is acceptable.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation therapy, Group B, Cervical cancer, Genitourinary system, Group A, Toxicity, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Preliminary study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for recurrent cervical cancer]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens