2011•Modern hospitalRequires access

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA WITH 0.67% ROPIVACAINE OR 0.5% BUPIVACAINE FOR CASEAREAN SECTION

Jin Qing Jiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine for caesarean section.Methods Sixty parturient undergoing caesarean section were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each): 0.67% ropivacaine group(group R)and 0.5% bupivacaine group(group B).Two groups received spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine 1.8 ml or 0.5% bupivacaine respectively.The condition of sense and motion blockade,adverse effect,relaxant condition of abdominal muscle,satisfaction,and Apgar score of neonate were recorded.Results All parturient received operation successfully under spinal anesthesia.Compared with group B,the onset time of sense and motion blockade increased significantly(p0.05).The sense blockade of thoracic vertebra level of group R was lower as compared to group B(p0.05).Compared with group B,the incidences of hypotension,bradycardia,nausea and vomiting,dyspnea,shivering,postoperative cacesthesia of lower limber,headache were decreased significantly(p0.05).The satisfaction level of group R was higher than that of group B(p0.05).There were no differences between two groups of the abdominal muscle relaxant condition and Apgar score(p0.05).Conclusion Spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine can be applied to caesarean section.Ropivacaine caused less adverse effect than bupivacaine,and provided higher satisfaction level.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine for caesarean section.Methods Sixty parturient undergoing caesarean section were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each): 0.67% ropivacaine group(group R)and 0.5% bupivacaine group(group B).Two groups received spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine 1.8 ml or 0.5% bupivacaine respectively.The condition of sense and motion blockade,adverse effect,relaxant condition of abdominal muscle,satisfaction,and Apgar score of neonate were recorded.Results All parturient received operation successfully under spinal anesthesia.Compared with group B,the onset time of sense and motion blockade increased significantly(p0.05).The sense blockade of thoracic vertebra level of group R was lower as compared to group B(p0.05).Compared with group B,the incidences of hypotension,bradycardia,nausea and vomiting,dyspnea,shivering,postoperative cacesthesia of lower limber,headache were decreased significantly(p0.05).The satisfaction level of group R was higher than that of group B(p0.05).There were no differences between two groups of the abdominal muscle relaxant condition and Apgar score(p0.05).Conclusion Spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine can be applied to caesarean section.Ropivacaine caused less adverse effect than bupivacaine,and provided higher satisfaction level.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine for caesarean section.Methods Sixty parturient undergoing caesarean section were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=30 each): 0.67% ropivacaine group(group R)and 0.5% bupivacaine group(group B).Two groups received spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine 1.8 ml or 0.5% bupivacaine respectively.The condition of sense and motion blockade,adverse effect,relaxant condition of abdominal muscle,satisfaction,and Apgar score of neonate were recorded.Results All parturient received operation successfully under spinal anesthesia.Compared with group B,the onset time of sense and motion blockade increased significantly(p0.05).The sense blockade of thoracic vertebra level of group R was lower as compared to group B(p0.05).Compared with group B,the incidences of hypotension,bradycardia,nausea and vomiting,dyspnea,shivering,postoperative cacesthesia of lower limber,headache were decreased significantly(p0.05).The satisfaction level of group R was higher than that of group B(p0.05).There were no differences between two groups of the abdominal muscle relaxant condition and Apgar score(p0.05).Conclusion Spinal anesthesia with 0.67% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine can be applied to caesarean section.Ropivacaine caused less adverse effect than bupivacaine,and provided higher satisfaction level.

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Bupivacaine, Caesarean section, Nausea, Vomiting, Apgar score

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SPINAL ANESTHESIA WITH 0.67% ROPIVACAINE OR 0.5% BUPIVACAINE FOR CASEAREAN SECTION — Research Paper | ScholarLens