Efficacy and safety of reboxetine versus fluoxetine for the elders with depression
Yu Li
Abstract
Yu Li
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in the elder patients with depression. Methods:60 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of depression of CC-MD-3 were randomly treated with reboxetine (4 -8 mg) or fluoxetine (20 - 40 mg) daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy and safety of therapy was assessed based on HAMD, CGI and TESS before and after treatment. Results:The effective rate of reboxetine versus fluoxetine was 80.00% versus 70.00% (P 0. 05 ). The side effects incidence of reboxetine showed no statistical difference from fluoxetine. Conclusion: Reboxetine offers effective and safe therapeutic option for geriatrics with depression.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in the elder patients with depression. Methods:60 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of depression of CC-MD-3 were randomly treated with reboxetine (4 -8 mg) or fluoxetine (20 - 40 mg) daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy and safety of therapy was assessed based on HAMD, CGI and TESS before and after treatment. Results:The effective rate of reboxetine versus fluoxetine was 80.00% versus 70.00% (P 0. 05 ). The side effects incidence of reboxetine showed no statistical difference from fluoxetine. Conclusion: Reboxetine offers effective and safe therapeutic option for geriatrics with depression.
Key concepts: Reboxetine, Fluoxetine, Hamd, Depression (economics), Medicine, Significant difference, Pharmacology, Psychology