2012Beijing Journal of StomatologyRequires access

Comparative study of the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults with micro-implant anchorage and headgear anchorage technique

Jingmin Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of micro-implant anchorage(MIA) and headgear anchorage(HGA)in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults.Methods Twenty-six adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups,MIA group(n=16) and HGA group(n=10).The cephalometric analysis was carried out before and after treatment,and the dental and skeletal changes were compared between two groups.ResultsThe methods showed similar results in skeletal changes,overjet and overbite.However,there was significant difference in the movements of upper incisors and molars between MIA and HGA group(P0.05).The distance of upper molar movement was 1.1mm in MIA group and 2.6mm in HGA group.The incisors were more retracted in MIA group(8.9mm) than in HGA group(5.5mm).Conclusion Both methods can achieve acceptable results.Compared with HGA,MIA was more effective in controlling the mesial movement of upper molar and the retraction of upper incisors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of micro-implant anchorage(MIA) and headgear anchorage(HGA)in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults.Methods Twenty-six adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups,MIA group(n=16) and HGA group(n=10).The cephalometric analysis was carried out before and after treatment,and the dental and skeletal changes were compared between two groups.ResultsThe methods showed similar results in skeletal changes,overjet and overbite.However,there was significant difference in the movements of upper incisors and molars between MIA and HGA group(P0.05).The distance of upper molar movement was 1.1mm in MIA group and 2.6mm in HGA group.The incisors were more retracted in MIA group(8.9mm) than in HGA group(5.5mm).Conclusion Both methods can achieve acceptable results.Compared with HGA,MIA was more effective in controlling the mesial movement of upper molar and the retraction of upper incisors.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of micro-implant anchorage(MIA) and headgear anchorage(HGA)in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults.Methods Twenty-six adult patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion were divided into two groups,MIA group(n=16) and HGA group(n=10).The cephalometric analysis was carried out before and after treatment,and the dental and skeletal changes were compared between two groups.ResultsThe methods showed similar results in skeletal changes,overjet and overbite.However,there was significant difference in the movements of upper incisors and molars between MIA and HGA group(P0.05).The distance of upper molar movement was 1.1mm in MIA group and 2.6mm in HGA group.The incisors were more retracted in MIA group(8.9mm) than in HGA group(5.5mm).Conclusion Both methods can achieve acceptable results.Compared with HGA,MIA was more effective in controlling the mesial movement of upper molar and the retraction of upper incisors.

Key concepts: Overjet, Overbite, Malocclusion, Medicine, Molar, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults with micro-implant anchorage and headgear anchorage technique — Research Paper | ScholarLens