2005Jibing jianceRequires access

Quality Analysis on the Reports of Notifiable Diseases in 2004

Guo Ya

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Objective This analysis was designed to evaluate the quality of online direct reporting of infectious diseases in 2004, so as to provide a scientific basis on which to further improve the reporting quality and perfect reporting system. Methods Factors that influenced the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases were analyzed based on the calculated average index of those factors to comprehensively assess the quality. Results Through censoring the reporting cards of infectious diseases, integrated analysis was carried out in terms of repetitive reports, reporting timeliness, nil reporting and types of primary reporting units, which was indicative of the reporting quality of epidemic situation nationwide. Conclusion Regular evaluation on the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases should be carried out. Moreover, key influential factors reflecting problems existing in local management of infectious diseases should also be assayed in order to provide guidance for future reporting work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective This analysis was designed to evaluate the quality of online direct reporting of infectious diseases in 2004, so as to provide a scientific basis on which to further improve the reporting quality and perfect reporting system. Methods Factors that influenced the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases were analyzed based on the calculated average index of those factors to comprehensively assess the quality. Results Through censoring the reporting cards of infectious diseases, integrated analysis was carried out in terms of repetitive reports, reporting timeliness, nil reporting and types of primary reporting units, which was indicative of the reporting quality of epidemic situation nationwide. Conclusion Regular evaluation on the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases should be carried out. Moreover, key influential factors reflecting problems existing in local management of infectious diseases should also be assayed in order to provide guidance for future reporting work.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective This analysis was designed to evaluate the quality of online direct reporting of infectious diseases in 2004, so as to provide a scientific basis on which to further improve the reporting quality and perfect reporting system. Methods Factors that influenced the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases were analyzed based on the calculated average index of those factors to comprehensively assess the quality. Results Through censoring the reporting cards of infectious diseases, integrated analysis was carried out in terms of repetitive reports, reporting timeliness, nil reporting and types of primary reporting units, which was indicative of the reporting quality of epidemic situation nationwide. Conclusion Regular evaluation on the reporting quality of epidemic situation of infectious diseases should be carried out. Moreover, key influential factors reflecting problems existing in local management of infectious diseases should also be assayed in order to provide guidance for future reporting work.

Key concepts: Medicine, Environmental health, Quality (philosophy), Risk analysis (engineering), Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality Analysis on the Reports of Notifiable Diseases in 2004 — Research Paper | ScholarLens