2013Yati yasui yazhoubingxue zazhiRequires access

Comparison of the effects of two prosthodontic designs for 112 mandibular molars after hemisection

Sun Jing

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the long-term clinical effects of two prosthodontic designs for mandibular molars after hemisection.METHODS: 112 mandibular molars with vertical root fracture were treated.Hemisection was performd and root canal therapy was conducted on the roots to be retained.Rigid fixed bridge(RFB,n=60) and cantilever fixed bridge(CFB,n=48) were respectively allowed after the surgery and the clinical effects were evaluated after 12 m,24 m and 36 m respectively.RESULTS: 12 months after tretment success rates of RFB and CFB were 100% and 95.83%(P0.05),24 months after tretment 89.66% and 71.74%(P0.05),36 months after tretment 88.37% and 35.48%(P0.05) respectively.CONCLUSION: After hemisection therapy on the mandibular molars with vertical root fracture rigid fixed bridge can achieve better long-term efficacy than cantilever fixed bridge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the long-term clinical effects of two prosthodontic designs for mandibular molars after hemisection.METHODS: 112 mandibular molars with vertical root fracture were treated.Hemisection was performd and root canal therapy was conducted on the roots to be retained.Rigid fixed bridge(RFB,n=60) and cantilever fixed bridge(CFB,n=48) were respectively allowed after the surgery and the clinical effects were evaluated after 12 m,24 m and 36 m respectively.RESULTS: 12 months after tretment success rates of RFB and CFB were 100% and 95.83%(P0.05),24 months after tretment 89.66% and 71.74%(P0.05),36 months after tretment 88.37% and 35.48%(P0.05) respectively.CONCLUSION: After hemisection therapy on the mandibular molars with vertical root fracture rigid fixed bridge can achieve better long-term efficacy than cantilever fixed bridge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the long-term clinical effects of two prosthodontic designs for mandibular molars after hemisection.METHODS: 112 mandibular molars with vertical root fracture were treated.Hemisection was performd and root canal therapy was conducted on the roots to be retained.Rigid fixed bridge(RFB,n=60) and cantilever fixed bridge(CFB,n=48) were respectively allowed after the surgery and the clinical effects were evaluated after 12 m,24 m and 36 m respectively.RESULTS: 12 months after tretment success rates of RFB and CFB were 100% and 95.83%(P0.05),24 months after tretment 89.66% and 71.74%(P0.05),36 months after tretment 88.37% and 35.48%(P0.05) respectively.CONCLUSION: After hemisection therapy on the mandibular molars with vertical root fracture rigid fixed bridge can achieve better long-term efficacy than cantilever fixed bridge.

Key concepts: Molar, Bridge (graph theory), Root canal, Dentistry, Medicine, Mandibular molar, Orthodontics, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the effects of two prosthodontic designs for 112 mandibular molars after hemisection — Research Paper | ScholarLens