2005•Journal of Qilu OncologyRequires access

Effect of TRAIL on sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy

Bao Xiu-feng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of TRAIL on the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy and study the principle of induction of apoptosis by TRAIL.METHODS:After the culture of human U251 glioma cell line, different doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the glioma cell. Viabilities of groups of TRAIL and VM26 were examined by MTT assay, components of DNA were examined by analytical method of DNA fragmentation, then sub-poison doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the same well of glioma cell. The apoptosis rates of three experimental groups were examined by FCM. RESULTS:The apoptosis rates of group of 100 ng/mL TRAIL, 2 μg/mL VM26, and the TRAIL combined with VM26 were 19%, 15% and 60% respectively. The apoptosis rate of glioma cell induced by VM26 was significantly lower than that of TRAIL combined with VM26,P=0.004. Typical DNA fragmentation appeared in the group of TRAIL and combination after DNA ladder.CONCLUSION:TRAIL could increase the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of TRAIL on the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy and study the principle of induction of apoptosis by TRAIL.METHODS:After the culture of human U251 glioma cell line, different doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the glioma cell. Viabilities of groups of TRAIL and VM26 were examined by MTT assay, components of DNA were examined by analytical method of DNA fragmentation, then sub-poison doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the same well of glioma cell. The apoptosis rates of three experimental groups were examined by FCM. RESULTS:The apoptosis rates of group of 100 ng/mL TRAIL, 2 μg/mL VM26, and the TRAIL combined with VM26 were 19%, 15% and 60% respectively. The apoptosis rate of glioma cell induced by VM26 was significantly lower than that of TRAIL combined with VM26,P=0.004. Typical DNA fragmentation appeared in the group of TRAIL and combination after DNA ladder.CONCLUSION:TRAIL could increase the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of TRAIL on the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy and study the principle of induction of apoptosis by TRAIL.METHODS:After the culture of human U251 glioma cell line, different doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the glioma cell. Viabilities of groups of TRAIL and VM26 were examined by MTT assay, components of DNA were examined by analytical method of DNA fragmentation, then sub-poison doses of TRAIL and VM26 were acted on the same well of glioma cell. The apoptosis rates of three experimental groups were examined by FCM. RESULTS:The apoptosis rates of group of 100 ng/mL TRAIL, 2 μg/mL VM26, and the TRAIL combined with VM26 were 19%, 15% and 60% respectively. The apoptosis rate of glioma cell induced by VM26 was significantly lower than that of TRAIL combined with VM26,P=0.004. Typical DNA fragmentation appeared in the group of TRAIL and combination after DNA ladder.CONCLUSION:TRAIL could increase the sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy.

Key concepts: Apoptosis, Glioma, DNA fragmentation, Fragmentation (computing), Cell culture, Cell, Chemotherapy, Cancer research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of TRAIL on sensitivity of human glioma cell line to chemotherapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens