SURVIVING IN THE SUBURBS: TRANSIT'S ULTIMATE CHALLENGE.
Robert Cervero
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert Cervero
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rapid decentralization of population and employment over the past several decades has chipped away at the American transit industry's market share. This paper examines the implications of decentralization on the ridership, operating performance, and fiscal health of the nation's largest transit operators. Based on the results of a national survey, a number of service strategies are explored that offer hope for reversing transit's decline, including: timed-transfers, paratransit services, reverse commute and specialized runs, employer-sponsored vanpools, and HOV/dedicated busway facilities. Land-use options, like traditional neighborhood designs and transit-based housing, are also examined. The paper ends with a discussion of various institutional, pricing, and organizational considerations when implementing service reforms and land-use initiatives. Century-old models involving joint public-private development of communities and transit facilities, it is argued, also deserve reconsideration.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Rapid decentralization of population and employment over the past several decades has chipped away at the American transit industry's market share. This paper examines the implications of decentralization on the ridership, operating performance, and fiscal health of the nation's largest transit operators. Based on the results of a national survey, a number of service strategies are explored that offer hope for reversing transit's decline, including: timed-transfers, paratransit services, reverse commute and specialized runs, employer-sponsored vanpools, and HOV/dedicated busway facilities. Land-use options, like traditional neighborhood designs and transit-based housing, are also examined. The paper ends with a discussion of various institutional, pricing, and organizational considerations when implementing service reforms and land-use initiatives. Century-old models involving joint public-private development of communities and transit facilities, it is argued, also deserve reconsideration.
Key concepts: Paratransit, Decentralization, Public transport, Business, Transit (satellite), Service (business), Population, Economic growth