2016•Jiangsu Xingzheng Xueyuan xuebaoRequires access

An Empirical Study on Response to Litigation against Administrative Omission

Yun-Li Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on the basic data collected from verdict documents from January 1,2014 to April 30,2015 as disclosed by China Verdict Net,in reality,a considerable number of people are unsatisfied with the process or results of due diligence on the part of administrative units,and think there exist administrative omission,so they initiate legal proceedings to protect their legitimate rights and interests.Among these litigations,the administrative units as defendants are accused of refusing to perform their statutory duties,inability to fully perform their statutory duties,delay in performing their statutory duties,and lack of factual and legal basis.The judiciary authorities also show certain problems in their attitude and methods in handling such cases.To better address the issue of administrative omission under new circumstances,firstly,it is necessary to strengthen supervision and accountability and encourage the prosecurats to file public interest litigations,so as to urge the administrative authorities to fully perform their statutory duties;secondly,it is also necessary for the judiciary authorities to exercise strict trial against administrative omission,make reasonable exercise of discretion,and give judiciary recommendations for defective administrative acts so as to exert their value-orientation role.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on the basic data collected from verdict documents from January 1,2014 to April 30,2015 as disclosed by China Verdict Net,in reality,a considerable number of people are unsatisfied with the process or results of due diligence on the part of administrative units,and think there exist administrative omission,so they initiate legal proceedings to protect their legitimate rights and interests.Among these litigations,the administrative units as defendants are accused of refusing to perform their statutory duties,inability to fully perform their statutory duties,delay in performing their statutory duties,and lack of factual and legal basis.The judiciary authorities also show certain problems in their attitude and methods in handling such cases.To better address the issue of administrative omission under new circumstances,firstly,it is necessary to strengthen supervision and accountability and encourage the prosecurats to file public interest litigations,so as to urge the administrative authorities to fully perform their statutory duties;secondly,it is also necessary for the judiciary authorities to exercise strict trial against administrative omission,make reasonable exercise of discretion,and give judiciary recommendations for defective administrative acts so as to exert their value-orientation role.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on the basic data collected from verdict documents from January 1,2014 to April 30,2015 as disclosed by China Verdict Net,in reality,a considerable number of people are unsatisfied with the process or results of due diligence on the part of administrative units,and think there exist administrative omission,so they initiate legal proceedings to protect their legitimate rights and interests.Among these litigations,the administrative units as defendants are accused of refusing to perform their statutory duties,inability to fully perform their statutory duties,delay in performing their statutory duties,and lack of factual and legal basis.The judiciary authorities also show certain problems in their attitude and methods in handling such cases.To better address the issue of administrative omission under new circumstances,firstly,it is necessary to strengthen supervision and accountability and encourage the prosecurats to file public interest litigations,so as to urge the administrative authorities to fully perform their statutory duties;secondly,it is also necessary for the judiciary authorities to exercise strict trial against administrative omission,make reasonable exercise of discretion,and give judiciary recommendations for defective administrative acts so as to exert their value-orientation role.

Key concepts: Statutory law, Verdict, Discretion, Accountability, Business, Diligence, Law, Administrative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Empirical Study on Response to Litigation against Administrative Omission — Research Paper | ScholarLens