2011Journal of Chinese OncologyRequires access

Chemotherapy with Pemetrexed Alone in the Treatment for 21 Elderly Cases with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Zhonghua Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Purpose] To investigate the response and side effect of pemetrexed alone in the treatment for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). [Methods] Forty-three elderly cases with NSCLC stage Ⅲ A ~ Ⅳ confirmed by pathology or cytology were divided into permetrexed group (n=21) and gemcitabine group (n=22). Patients in pemetrexed group received pemetrexed 500mg/m 2 , iv drip,d 1 ; patients in gemcitabine group received gemcitabine1000 mg/ m 2 , iv drip,d 1,8,15 . Every 21 days as a cycle. All patients received 2 cycles chemotherapy, and the response and side effect were evaluated every 2 cycles. [Results] The clinical benefit rate in pemetrexed group and gemcitabine group was 57.14% and 59.09% (P =0.897) respectively.The median survival time was 9.5 and 8.9 months (P=0.813) respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 28.6% and 27.3% (P =0.9244) respectively. The main side effects were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. The neutropenia rate in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (gradeⅠ~Ⅱ: 19.05% vs 59.09% ,P=0.0073; grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:9.52% vs 27.2%, P =0.0261). The gastrointestinal toxicity in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (grade Ⅰ~Ⅱ: 14.29% vs 59.01%, P=0.0017;grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:4.76% vs 40.91% , P=0.0050). [Conclusion] Chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is effective, but the side effect of pemetrexed is lower than that of gemcitabine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Purpose] To investigate the response and side effect of pemetrexed alone in the treatment for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). [Methods] Forty-three elderly cases with NSCLC stage Ⅲ A ~ Ⅳ confirmed by pathology or cytology were divided into permetrexed group (n=21) and gemcitabine group (n=22). Patients in pemetrexed group received pemetrexed 500mg/m 2 , iv drip,d 1 ; patients in gemcitabine group received gemcitabine1000 mg/ m 2 , iv drip,d 1,8,15 . Every 21 days as a cycle. All patients received 2 cycles chemotherapy, and the response and side effect were evaluated every 2 cycles. [Results] The clinical benefit rate in pemetrexed group and gemcitabine group was 57.14% and 59.09% (P =0.897) respectively.The median survival time was 9.5 and 8.9 months (P=0.813) respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 28.6% and 27.3% (P =0.9244) respectively. The main side effects were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. The neutropenia rate in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (gradeⅠ~Ⅱ: 19.05% vs 59.09% ,P=0.0073; grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:9.52% vs 27.2%, P =0.0261). The gastrointestinal toxicity in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (grade Ⅰ~Ⅱ: 14.29% vs 59.01%, P=0.0017;grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:4.76% vs 40.91% , P=0.0050). [Conclusion] Chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is effective, but the side effect of pemetrexed is lower than that of gemcitabine.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Purpose] To investigate the response and side effect of pemetrexed alone in the treatment for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). [Methods] Forty-three elderly cases with NSCLC stage Ⅲ A ~ Ⅳ confirmed by pathology or cytology were divided into permetrexed group (n=21) and gemcitabine group (n=22). Patients in pemetrexed group received pemetrexed 500mg/m 2 , iv drip,d 1 ; patients in gemcitabine group received gemcitabine1000 mg/ m 2 , iv drip,d 1,8,15 . Every 21 days as a cycle. All patients received 2 cycles chemotherapy, and the response and side effect were evaluated every 2 cycles. [Results] The clinical benefit rate in pemetrexed group and gemcitabine group was 57.14% and 59.09% (P =0.897) respectively.The median survival time was 9.5 and 8.9 months (P=0.813) respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 28.6% and 27.3% (P =0.9244) respectively. The main side effects were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. The neutropenia rate in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (gradeⅠ~Ⅱ: 19.05% vs 59.09% ,P=0.0073; grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:9.52% vs 27.2%, P =0.0261). The gastrointestinal toxicity in pemetrexed group was significantly less than that in gemcitabine group (grade Ⅰ~Ⅱ: 14.29% vs 59.01%, P=0.0017;grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ:4.76% vs 40.91% , P=0.0050). [Conclusion] Chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is effective, but the side effect of pemetrexed is lower than that of gemcitabine.

Key concepts: Pemetrexed, Gemcitabine, Medicine, Internal medicine, Lung cancer, Chemotherapy, Neutropenia, Oncology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chemotherapy with Pemetrexed Alone in the Treatment for 21 Elderly Cases with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens