Preliminary Study on Methods Selection in Treatment of Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition
GU Yon
Abstract
GU Yon
Abstract
Objective To help clinicians make a decision on treatment plan of Class Ⅲ malocclusion with undeveloped maxilla in mixed dentition. Methods The sample included orthodontic treatment and orthopedic treatment groups, which consisted of 15 patients, respectively, with Class Ⅲ malocclusion due to undeveloped maxilla. The selection criteria included (1) Anterior crossbites (2 ) - 2 ANB 1 ( 3 ) Cephalometric analysis showed undeveloped maxilla and normal growth of the mandible (4) Growing patients (5) Mild Concave profile. Patients in orthodontic group were treated with 2×4 appliance and with stable treatment effects after two years follow - up. Patients in orthopedic group were treated with reverse headgear when failure or relapse was noted after treatment with 2×4 appliance within one year. Cephalometric analysis was performed with pretreatment lateral cephalograms. T - test was assessed to compare significant difference between the two groups. Discriminate analysis was performed and its result helped to select the treatment method to Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition. Results The average value of NSAr was significantly smaller in orthodontic treatment group ( p 0.01) , anterior cranial base length ( p 0.001) and posterior cranial base length (p0.01) was significantly larger in orthodontic treatment group. Prediction Index (PI) = -0.2 (NSAr) + 0.243 (anterior cranial base length) + 0.187 (posterior cranial base length) + 3.366. Conclusion With larger PI ( 0) , with greater success of treatment with 2×4 appliances in Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition, due to undeveloped maxilla is expected.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To help clinicians make a decision on treatment plan of Class Ⅲ malocclusion with undeveloped maxilla in mixed dentition. Methods The sample included orthodontic treatment and orthopedic treatment groups, which consisted of 15 patients, respectively, with Class Ⅲ malocclusion due to undeveloped maxilla. The selection criteria included (1) Anterior crossbites (2 ) - 2 ANB 1 ( 3 ) Cephalometric analysis showed undeveloped maxilla and normal growth of the mandible (4) Growing patients (5) Mild Concave profile. Patients in orthodontic group were treated with 2×4 appliance and with stable treatment effects after two years follow - up. Patients in orthopedic group were treated with reverse headgear when failure or relapse was noted after treatment with 2×4 appliance within one year. Cephalometric analysis was performed with pretreatment lateral cephalograms. T - test was assessed to compare significant difference between the two groups. Discriminate analysis was performed and its result helped to select the treatment method to Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition. Results The average value of NSAr was significantly smaller in orthodontic treatment group ( p 0.01) , anterior cranial base length ( p 0.001) and posterior cranial base length (p0.01) was significantly larger in orthodontic treatment group. Prediction Index (PI) = -0.2 (NSAr) + 0.243 (anterior cranial base length) + 0.187 (posterior cranial base length) + 3.366. Conclusion With larger PI ( 0) , with greater success of treatment with 2×4 appliances in Class Ⅲ malocclusion in mixed dentition, due to undeveloped maxilla is expected.
Key concepts: Medicine, Maxilla, Cephalometric analysis, Dentistry, Malocclusion, Orthodontics, Dentition, Case selection