2008Zhongguo Renmin Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Reflection on Alternative Philosophy of Science

Liu Yong-mou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A prominent phenomena in contemporary philosophy of science has been the unexpected uprising of alternative philosophy of science.This thesis analyzes in depth such alternative philosophies of science by Paul Feyerabend,Richard Rorty,and Michel Foucult,summarizing the similarities and comparing the differences between alternative philosophy of science and traditional philosophy of science,so as to unveil the development trends of contemporary philosophy of science.It is viewed that with different theme and foundation,alternative philosophy of science has made break-through in scope and research methodology,and its relation with science has shifted to be humanism-oriented,with more diversities presented.Attention should be given to alternative perceptions in contemporary philosophy of science,and research can be expanded to fields of epistemology of science and cognitive science,of sociology of science knowledge and science anthropology,of philosophy of science culture,as well as science ethics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A prominent phenomena in contemporary philosophy of science has been the unexpected uprising of alternative philosophy of science.This thesis analyzes in depth such alternative philosophies of science by Paul Feyerabend,Richard Rorty,and Michel Foucult,summarizing the similarities and comparing the differences between alternative philosophy of science and traditional philosophy of science,so as to unveil the development trends of contemporary philosophy of science.It is viewed that with different theme and foundation,alternative philosophy of science has made break-through in scope and research methodology,and its relation with science has shifted to be humanism-oriented,with more diversities presented.Attention should be given to alternative perceptions in contemporary philosophy of science,and research can be expanded to fields of epistemology of science and cognitive science,of sociology of science knowledge and science anthropology,of philosophy of science culture,as well as science ethics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A prominent phenomena in contemporary philosophy of science has been the unexpected uprising of alternative philosophy of science.This thesis analyzes in depth such alternative philosophies of science by Paul Feyerabend,Richard Rorty,and Michel Foucult,summarizing the similarities and comparing the differences between alternative philosophy of science and traditional philosophy of science,so as to unveil the development trends of contemporary philosophy of science.It is viewed that with different theme and foundation,alternative philosophy of science has made break-through in scope and research methodology,and its relation with science has shifted to be humanism-oriented,with more diversities presented.Attention should be given to alternative perceptions in contemporary philosophy of science,and research can be expanded to fields of epistemology of science and cognitive science,of sociology of science knowledge and science anthropology,of philosophy of science culture,as well as science ethics.

Key concepts: Philosophy of science, Philosophy of computer science, Epistemology, Western philosophy, Philosophy education, Science studies, Relation (database), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reflection on Alternative Philosophy of Science — Research Paper | ScholarLens