2002Jiefangjun Waiyu Xueyuan xuebaoRequires access

A Critique of Irony Theories

Zhengguang Liu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Irony study is drawing more and more attention from philosophers, psychologists and linguists as well as cognitive scientists, in that it will shed light on the comprehension process of nonliteral language,including metaphor. Meanwhile it will bring out the difference between irony and metaphor comprehension.This paper is mainly intended to make clear the following three issues concerning irony: motivation for irony, its nature, mechanism for distinguishing irony from non-irony through the critical reviewing of some major theories of irony, including their respective theoretical strengths and inadequacies. As the discussion shows,each theory has its own merits and values in the explanation of the different aspects of irony. The paper also outlines the possible areas and theoretical significance for future research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Irony study is drawing more and more attention from philosophers, psychologists and linguists as well as cognitive scientists, in that it will shed light on the comprehension process of nonliteral language,including metaphor. Meanwhile it will bring out the difference between irony and metaphor comprehension.This paper is mainly intended to make clear the following three issues concerning irony: motivation for irony, its nature, mechanism for distinguishing irony from non-irony through the critical reviewing of some major theories of irony, including their respective theoretical strengths and inadequacies. As the discussion shows,each theory has its own merits and values in the explanation of the different aspects of irony. The paper also outlines the possible areas and theoretical significance for future research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Irony study is drawing more and more attention from philosophers, psychologists and linguists as well as cognitive scientists, in that it will shed light on the comprehension process of nonliteral language,including metaphor. Meanwhile it will bring out the difference between irony and metaphor comprehension.This paper is mainly intended to make clear the following three issues concerning irony: motivation for irony, its nature, mechanism for distinguishing irony from non-irony through the critical reviewing of some major theories of irony, including their respective theoretical strengths and inadequacies. As the discussion shows,each theory has its own merits and values in the explanation of the different aspects of irony. The paper also outlines the possible areas and theoretical significance for future research.

Key concepts: Irony, Metaphor, Comprehension, Epistemology, Philosophy, Linguistics, Sociology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Critique of Irony Theories — Research Paper | ScholarLens