A phase II randomized,double blind, multi-centers and parallel control clinical trial for bupropion SR in the treatment of depressive disorders
Liang Shu
Abstract
Liang Shu
Abstract
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bupropion made in China for the treatment of depressive disorders. Methods:237 patients with depressive disorders enrolled in a randomized, double blind, multi-center, parallel control clinical study were randomized orally to receive either bupropion 150~450 mg daily (n=119) or fluoxetine 10~30 mg daily (n=118) for 6 weeks. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression were used to evaluate the efficacy. The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale was used to assess the safety. Results:The HAMD scores and CGI scores in both groups showed significant reductions at the end of therapy in comparison with the baselines(P 0. 05). The overall efficacy rate of bupropion and fluoxetine were 70.69% and 74. 14% , respectively (P0.05). The incidence rate of adverse events the bupropion-treated and fluoxetine-treated patients experienced were 41.4% and 44. 8% , respectively (P0.05). Conclusion; Bupropion provided an alternative therapeutics against depressive episodes.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bupropion made in China for the treatment of depressive disorders. Methods:237 patients with depressive disorders enrolled in a randomized, double blind, multi-center, parallel control clinical study were randomized orally to receive either bupropion 150~450 mg daily (n=119) or fluoxetine 10~30 mg daily (n=118) for 6 weeks. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impression were used to evaluate the efficacy. The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale was used to assess the safety. Results:The HAMD scores and CGI scores in both groups showed significant reductions at the end of therapy in comparison with the baselines(P 0. 05). The overall efficacy rate of bupropion and fluoxetine were 70.69% and 74. 14% , respectively (P0.05). The incidence rate of adverse events the bupropion-treated and fluoxetine-treated patients experienced were 41.4% and 44. 8% , respectively (P0.05). Conclusion; Bupropion provided an alternative therapeutics against depressive episodes.
Key concepts: Bupropion, Hamd, Clinical Global Impression, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Major depressive disorder, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Adverse effect