Efficacy of intravenous injection of amiodarone and propafenone for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Yuan Yun-hua
Abstract
Yuan Yun-hua
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and security of amiodarone and propafenone on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Methods Sixty-two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomly divided into two groups:amiodarone(n=32) and propafenone(n=30)group.In amiodarone group,150mg amiodarone was injected intravenously firstly,then continuously pumped with 1mg/min for 6 hour and with 0.5mg/min for 18 hours in proper order. In propafenone group,70mg propafenone was given intravenously.Results The conversion rate to sinus rhythm was 81.25%(26/32) in amiodarone group and 70.00%(21/30)in propafenone group(P0.05).The side effect was 15.6%(5/32) in amiodarone group and 23.3%(7/30) in the propafenone group(P0.05).Conclusion It is suggested that intravenous injection of amiodarone is more effective and safe than propafenone for rapid conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the efficacy and security of amiodarone and propafenone on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.Methods Sixty-two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomly divided into two groups:amiodarone(n=32) and propafenone(n=30)group.In amiodarone group,150mg amiodarone was injected intravenously firstly,then continuously pumped with 1mg/min for 6 hour and with 0.5mg/min for 18 hours in proper order. In propafenone group,70mg propafenone was given intravenously.Results The conversion rate to sinus rhythm was 81.25%(26/32) in amiodarone group and 70.00%(21/30)in propafenone group(P0.05).The side effect was 15.6%(5/32) in amiodarone group and 23.3%(7/30) in the propafenone group(P0.05).Conclusion It is suggested that intravenous injection of amiodarone is more effective and safe than propafenone for rapid conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.
Key concepts: Propafenone, Amiodarone, Medicine, Sinus rhythm, Atrial fibrillation, Anesthesia, Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Cardiology