Mechanism of in-stent restenosis:An intravascular ultrasound observation
Li Jun
Abstract
Li Jun
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the in-stent restenosis process by coronary artery angiography (CAG) and intravascular ultrasound(IVUS). METHODS: The study consisted of 92 patients with 118 stents(LAD53, L32, RCA33). Follow-up CAG and IVUS were performed 6 months after stent placement. There were 39 stents with and 79 stents without in-stent restenosis by CAG. The reference areas, minimal stent cross-sectional areas(CSA), minimal stent luminal CSA, intimal hyperplasia CSA, stent lumen and intimal hyperpla volume were measured by IVUS. RESULTS: Reference areas, minimal stent CSA and stent volume had no significant differences between restenotic and nonrestenotic stents(P0.01). Restenotic stents had smaller minimal stent luminal CSA (2.3±1.1)mm~2 vs (5.4±1.8) mm~2, P0.01 than nonrestenotic stents, but had bigger intimal hyperplasia CSA and intimal hyperplasia volume than nonrestenotic stents (4.7±1.5) mm~2 vs (1.6±0.8) mm~2, (121.1±31.9) mm~3 vs (54.3±11.4) mm~3, P0.01〕. CONCLUSION: Intimal hyperplasia was important in the development of in-stent restenosis. But the vascular remodeling and the degree of stent dilation had no obvious relationship with in-stent restenosis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To investigate the in-stent restenosis process by coronary artery angiography (CAG) and intravascular ultrasound(IVUS). METHODS: The study consisted of 92 patients with 118 stents(LAD53, L32, RCA33). Follow-up CAG and IVUS were performed 6 months after stent placement. There were 39 stents with and 79 stents without in-stent restenosis by CAG. The reference areas, minimal stent cross-sectional areas(CSA), minimal stent luminal CSA, intimal hyperplasia CSA, stent lumen and intimal hyperpla volume were measured by IVUS. RESULTS: Reference areas, minimal stent CSA and stent volume had no significant differences between restenotic and nonrestenotic stents(P0.01). Restenotic stents had smaller minimal stent luminal CSA (2.3±1.1)mm~2 vs (5.4±1.8) mm~2, P0.01 than nonrestenotic stents, but had bigger intimal hyperplasia CSA and intimal hyperplasia volume than nonrestenotic stents (4.7±1.5) mm~2 vs (1.6±0.8) mm~2, (121.1±31.9) mm~3 vs (54.3±11.4) mm~3, P0.01〕. CONCLUSION: Intimal hyperplasia was important in the development of in-stent restenosis. But the vascular remodeling and the degree of stent dilation had no obvious relationship with in-stent restenosis.
Key concepts: Restenosis, Intravascular ultrasound, Intimal hyperplasia, Stent, Medicine, Lumen (anatomy), Radiology, Angiography