2003•Zhonghua gan-dan waike zazhiRequires access

Postoperative recovery after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional Whipple operation: an analysis of 112 consecutive cases

Qunhua Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the postoperative recovery after pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) versus conventional Whipple operation. Methods The postoperative recovery was compared between 49 patients receiving PPPD and 63 undergoing Whipple operation from 1998 to 2001. Results Operative duration, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications were lower but gastric suction time and delayed gastric emptying occurrence were higher in patients receiving PPPD than in those undergoing Whipple operation. The patients with the history of abdominal operation and those with intraabdominal complications showed a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying (35 5%:11 1%, 46 2%:9 3%, P0 05). Conclusions PPPD is a safe surgical procedure and the pylorus preservation does not influence the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and the postoperative recovery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the postoperative recovery after pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) versus conventional Whipple operation. Methods The postoperative recovery was compared between 49 patients receiving PPPD and 63 undergoing Whipple operation from 1998 to 2001. Results Operative duration, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications were lower but gastric suction time and delayed gastric emptying occurrence were higher in patients receiving PPPD than in those undergoing Whipple operation. The patients with the history of abdominal operation and those with intraabdominal complications showed a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying (35 5%:11 1%, 46 2%:9 3%, P0 05). Conclusions PPPD is a safe surgical procedure and the pylorus preservation does not influence the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and the postoperative recovery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the postoperative recovery after pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) versus conventional Whipple operation. Methods The postoperative recovery was compared between 49 patients receiving PPPD and 63 undergoing Whipple operation from 1998 to 2001. Results Operative duration, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications were lower but gastric suction time and delayed gastric emptying occurrence were higher in patients receiving PPPD than in those undergoing Whipple operation. The patients with the history of abdominal operation and those with intraabdominal complications showed a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying (35 5%:11 1%, 46 2%:9 3%, P0 05). Conclusions PPPD is a safe surgical procedure and the pylorus preservation does not influence the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and the postoperative recovery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gastric emptying, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pylorus, Surgery, Incidence (geometry), Whipple Procedure, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postoperative recovery after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional Whipple operation: an analysis of 112 consecutive cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens