2005Unpublished venueRequires access

A Clinical Observation of Intravenous Urapidil Versus Nitroglycerin in the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure

Hong Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the Short-term efficacy of urapidil for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Methods A total of 48 patients with advanced heart failure(NYHA class Ⅳ)were randomly assigned to open-labeled treatment with urapidil(n=24)or nitroglycerin (n=24 ) . Both groups were comparable in respect of age, heart rate and blood pressure. Intravenous urapidil(50~100μg/min)or nitroglycerin(10~20μg/min)was administered for 24 hours(based on blood pressure) in addition to ordinarily treatment (diuretic and digitalis).Heart rate, blood pressure were measured and echocardiography was performed before and after the treatment. Results No significant changes of heart rate, diastolic blood pressures were found between two groups. In the nitroglycerin group, only ejection fraction(P0.05)increased significantly and E doc prolonged(P0.05).In the urapidil group, the systolic stroke volume measured by echocardiography increased(P0.05)significantly compared to the baseline, and so were ejection fraction(P0.05)and AoVmax(P0.05).Conclusions Short term use of intravenous urapidil for advanced heart failure significantly improve cardiac systolic function, especially in the patients with hypertension. Also, it is safe and well tolerated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the Short-term efficacy of urapidil for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Methods A total of 48 patients with advanced heart failure(NYHA class Ⅳ)were randomly assigned to open-labeled treatment with urapidil(n=24)or nitroglycerin (n=24 ) . Both groups were comparable in respect of age, heart rate and blood pressure. Intravenous urapidil(50~100μg/min)or nitroglycerin(10~20μg/min)was administered for 24 hours(based on blood pressure) in addition to ordinarily treatment (diuretic and digitalis).Heart rate, blood pressure were measured and echocardiography was performed before and after the treatment. Results No significant changes of heart rate, diastolic blood pressures were found between two groups. In the nitroglycerin group, only ejection fraction(P0.05)increased significantly and E doc prolonged(P0.05).In the urapidil group, the systolic stroke volume measured by echocardiography increased(P0.05)significantly compared to the baseline, and so were ejection fraction(P0.05)and AoVmax(P0.05).Conclusions Short term use of intravenous urapidil for advanced heart failure significantly improve cardiac systolic function, especially in the patients with hypertension. Also, it is safe and well tolerated.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the Short-term efficacy of urapidil for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. Methods A total of 48 patients with advanced heart failure(NYHA class Ⅳ)were randomly assigned to open-labeled treatment with urapidil(n=24)or nitroglycerin (n=24 ) . Both groups were comparable in respect of age, heart rate and blood pressure. Intravenous urapidil(50~100μg/min)or nitroglycerin(10~20μg/min)was administered for 24 hours(based on blood pressure) in addition to ordinarily treatment (diuretic and digitalis).Heart rate, blood pressure were measured and echocardiography was performed before and after the treatment. Results No significant changes of heart rate, diastolic blood pressures were found between two groups. In the nitroglycerin group, only ejection fraction(P0.05)increased significantly and E doc prolonged(P0.05).In the urapidil group, the systolic stroke volume measured by echocardiography increased(P0.05)significantly compared to the baseline, and so were ejection fraction(P0.05)and AoVmax(P0.05).Conclusions Short term use of intravenous urapidil for advanced heart failure significantly improve cardiac systolic function, especially in the patients with hypertension. Also, it is safe and well tolerated.

Key concepts: Urapidil, Medicine, Ejection fraction, Blood pressure, Heart failure, Heart rate, Cardiology, Digitalis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Clinical Observation of Intravenous Urapidil Versus Nitroglycerin in the Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens