2004•Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Analysis of Some Philosophical Matters and Historical Data Relevant to Cheng Brothers

Pang Wan-li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper probes into the difference between Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi in their thoughts, and concludes that Cheng Hao stressed virtue in pursuit of the transcendental moral values of life, while Cheng Yi emphasized knowledge so as to grasp the nature of physical phenomena, and their universal principle, namely the law of nature, is that both human beings and the world are characterized with the absoluteness of inherently transcendental morality. The author argues that Chou Tun-Yi, Chang Tsai, Cheng Hao and Hu Hung's theories of human nature fall into the category of good-naturedness of human beings, among which Chang Tsai's theory is characterized with dualism between supreme void and ether. The paper attempts to make a textual research into the authorship of the book CUI YAN, and into the problem concerning the ideas of the other in their respective work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper probes into the difference between Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi in their thoughts, and concludes that Cheng Hao stressed virtue in pursuit of the transcendental moral values of life, while Cheng Yi emphasized knowledge so as to grasp the nature of physical phenomena, and their universal principle, namely the law of nature, is that both human beings and the world are characterized with the absoluteness of inherently transcendental morality. The author argues that Chou Tun-Yi, Chang Tsai, Cheng Hao and Hu Hung's theories of human nature fall into the category of good-naturedness of human beings, among which Chang Tsai's theory is characterized with dualism between supreme void and ether. The paper attempts to make a textual research into the authorship of the book CUI YAN, and into the problem concerning the ideas of the other in their respective work.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper probes into the difference between Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi in their thoughts, and concludes that Cheng Hao stressed virtue in pursuit of the transcendental moral values of life, while Cheng Yi emphasized knowledge so as to grasp the nature of physical phenomena, and their universal principle, namely the law of nature, is that both human beings and the world are characterized with the absoluteness of inherently transcendental morality. The author argues that Chou Tun-Yi, Chang Tsai, Cheng Hao and Hu Hung's theories of human nature fall into the category of good-naturedness of human beings, among which Chang Tsai's theory is characterized with dualism between supreme void and ether. The paper attempts to make a textual research into the authorship of the book CUI YAN, and into the problem concerning the ideas of the other in their respective work.

Key concepts: Absoluteness, Transcendental number, Dualism, Philosophy, Morality, Epistemology, Virtue, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Some Philosophical Matters and Historical Data Relevant to Cheng Brothers — Research Paper | ScholarLens