2013Chinese Journal of Birth Health & HeredityRequires access

A comparison of three controlled ovarian stimulation protocols in decreased ovarian reserve patients

Ying Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the stimulation effects and the clinical outcomes of GnRH agonist long protocol,GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol regimens in decreased ovarian reserve patients in IVF / ICSI cycles.Method: Women for in vitro fertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)-embryo transfer(ET) therapy due to the tubal and / or male factors were included in this study.169 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles were analyzed.Women general characteristics,basal and hCG day hormones,oocytes retrieved,fertilization,transfer embryos,duration of COS,dosage of ganadotropins and pregnant outcomes were evaluated.Results: There was no significant difference on the general characteristics,hormone levels,retrieved oocytes and fertilization gametes in three protocols(P 0.05).The usage of gonadotropins and duration of COS in GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol groups were significantly less than GnRH agonist long protocol group.The clinical pregnancy rates were 29.57%,23.45%,33.69% respectively in GnRH agonist long,short and antagonist group,there was no significant difference among them(P 0.05).Conclusion: GnRH antagonist protocol is likely to be an alternative method for COH in decreased ovarian reserve patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the stimulation effects and the clinical outcomes of GnRH agonist long protocol,GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol regimens in decreased ovarian reserve patients in IVF / ICSI cycles.Method: Women for in vitro fertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)-embryo transfer(ET) therapy due to the tubal and / or male factors were included in this study.169 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles were analyzed.Women general characteristics,basal and hCG day hormones,oocytes retrieved,fertilization,transfer embryos,duration of COS,dosage of ganadotropins and pregnant outcomes were evaluated.Results: There was no significant difference on the general characteristics,hormone levels,retrieved oocytes and fertilization gametes in three protocols(P 0.05).The usage of gonadotropins and duration of COS in GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol groups were significantly less than GnRH agonist long protocol group.The clinical pregnancy rates were 29.57%,23.45%,33.69% respectively in GnRH agonist long,short and antagonist group,there was no significant difference among them(P 0.05).Conclusion: GnRH antagonist protocol is likely to be an alternative method for COH in decreased ovarian reserve patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the stimulation effects and the clinical outcomes of GnRH agonist long protocol,GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol regimens in decreased ovarian reserve patients in IVF / ICSI cycles.Method: Women for in vitro fertilization(IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)-embryo transfer(ET) therapy due to the tubal and / or male factors were included in this study.169 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles were analyzed.Women general characteristics,basal and hCG day hormones,oocytes retrieved,fertilization,transfer embryos,duration of COS,dosage of ganadotropins and pregnant outcomes were evaluated.Results: There was no significant difference on the general characteristics,hormone levels,retrieved oocytes and fertilization gametes in three protocols(P 0.05).The usage of gonadotropins and duration of COS in GnRH agonist short protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol groups were significantly less than GnRH agonist long protocol group.The clinical pregnancy rates were 29.57%,23.45%,33.69% respectively in GnRH agonist long,short and antagonist group,there was no significant difference among them(P 0.05).Conclusion: GnRH antagonist protocol is likely to be an alternative method for COH in decreased ovarian reserve patients.

Key concepts: Agonist, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Ovarian reserve, In vitro fertilisation, Embryo transfer, Andrology, Medicine, Hormone antagonist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of three controlled ovarian stimulation protocols in decreased ovarian reserve patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens