2006•Zhongguo yaofangRequires access

Bioavailability of Lipantil Capsule (Micronized) in Human Body

Huang Zhongyi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study bioequiavailability of two preparations of Lipantil capsule micronized in human body. METHODS: A total of 24 male healthy volunteers were assigned to receive lipantil capsules (test preparation) 160mg and common fenofibrate capsules (reference substance) 200mg in a randomized crossover way. Blood concentrations of the subjects were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were computed as well. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of lipantil capsule vs. common fenofibrate capsule were as follows: tmax was (3.91±1.00) h vs. (3.74±0.86) h,Cmax was (10.33±3.26) μg/ml vs. (10.61±2.79) μg/ml, AUC0~72 was (173.54±56.04)(μg·h)/ml vs. (176.69±47.13) (μg·h)/ml,t1/2 was (22.25±3.78) h vs. (23.19±3.71) h. The relative bioavailability of lipantil capsule was (97.80±14.32) %. CONCLUSION: The two preparations nad the bio equiavailability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study bioequiavailability of two preparations of Lipantil capsule micronized in human body. METHODS: A total of 24 male healthy volunteers were assigned to receive lipantil capsules (test preparation) 160mg and common fenofibrate capsules (reference substance) 200mg in a randomized crossover way. Blood concentrations of the subjects were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were computed as well. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of lipantil capsule vs. common fenofibrate capsule were as follows: tmax was (3.91±1.00) h vs. (3.74±0.86) h,Cmax was (10.33±3.26) μg/ml vs. (10.61±2.79) μg/ml, AUC0~72 was (173.54±56.04)(μg·h)/ml vs. (176.69±47.13) (μg·h)/ml,t1/2 was (22.25±3.78) h vs. (23.19±3.71) h. The relative bioavailability of lipantil capsule was (97.80±14.32) %. CONCLUSION: The two preparations nad the bio equiavailability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study bioequiavailability of two preparations of Lipantil capsule micronized in human body. METHODS: A total of 24 male healthy volunteers were assigned to receive lipantil capsules (test preparation) 160mg and common fenofibrate capsules (reference substance) 200mg in a randomized crossover way. Blood concentrations of the subjects were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters and relative bioavailability were computed as well. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of lipantil capsule vs. common fenofibrate capsule were as follows: tmax was (3.91±1.00) h vs. (3.74±0.86) h,Cmax was (10.33±3.26) μg/ml vs. (10.61±2.79) μg/ml, AUC0~72 was (173.54±56.04)(μg·h)/ml vs. (176.69±47.13) (μg·h)/ml,t1/2 was (22.25±3.78) h vs. (23.19±3.71) h. The relative bioavailability of lipantil capsule was (97.80±14.32) %. CONCLUSION: The two preparations nad the bio equiavailability.

Key concepts: Capsule, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Cmax, Fenofibrate, Bioequivalence, Chemistry, Crossover study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioavailability of Lipantil Capsule (Micronized) in Human Body — Research Paper | ScholarLens