2009•Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiuRequires access

Counterfactuals and Causal Mechanisms

Li Zhen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Among the current discussion about theory of causation,a heated debate has happened between counterfactual approach and mechanistic approach.Advocates of each argue that their own approach fairs much better than their opponents'.Advocates of counterfactual approach attempt to prove theory of mechanisms needs counterfactuals,and can't get out of the difficulty causal relevance,while advocates of mechanistic approach argue that counterfactual itself has severe difficulties,so it can't be the basis of theory of causation.This paper shows counterfactuals are more basic than mechanisms.However,the two approaches need not be in conflict.If they can complement each other,that is,if the counterfactual theory of causation can be added the mechanistic consideration,than many difficulties can be avoided,and it is helpful to understand and establish relations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Among the current discussion about theory of causation,a heated debate has happened between counterfactual approach and mechanistic approach.Advocates of each argue that their own approach fairs much better than their opponents'.Advocates of counterfactual approach attempt to prove theory of mechanisms needs counterfactuals,and can't get out of the difficulty causal relevance,while advocates of mechanistic approach argue that counterfactual itself has severe difficulties,so it can't be the basis of theory of causation.This paper shows counterfactuals are more basic than mechanisms.However,the two approaches need not be in conflict.If they can complement each other,that is,if the counterfactual theory of causation can be added the mechanistic consideration,than many difficulties can be avoided,and it is helpful to understand and establish relations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Among the current discussion about theory of causation,a heated debate has happened between counterfactual approach and mechanistic approach.Advocates of each argue that their own approach fairs much better than their opponents'.Advocates of counterfactual approach attempt to prove theory of mechanisms needs counterfactuals,and can't get out of the difficulty causal relevance,while advocates of mechanistic approach argue that counterfactual itself has severe difficulties,so it can't be the basis of theory of causation.This paper shows counterfactuals are more basic than mechanisms.However,the two approaches need not be in conflict.If they can complement each other,that is,if the counterfactual theory of causation can be added the mechanistic consideration,than many difficulties can be avoided,and it is helpful to understand and establish relations.

Key concepts: Counterfactual conditional, Counterfactual thinking, Causation, Causal model, Epistemology, Complement (music), Relevance (law), Causality (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Counterfactuals and Causal Mechanisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens