2010•China Practical MedicineRequires access

Influence of combined spinal epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome

Ping Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia(CSEA)and patient-control epidural analgesia(PCEA)has influence on labor progress,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome.Methods Cases data of 406 healthy nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed,study group(345 cases)accepted CSEA+PCEA and control group(282 cases)without CSEA+PCEA,to compare the labor progress,delivery way and the maternal and fetal outcome.Results The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the study group[(223.33 ±105.85)min,(59.29 ±33.155)min]were significantly longer than that of control group[(176.14±99.66)min,(46.71±33.69)]min(P0.01),the rate of augmentation by oxytocin and the occurrence of arrested active phase in the study group(60.00%,6.67%)were significantly higher than that of control group(27.68%,2.34%)(P0.001,P=0.034),The rate of cesarean section and urinary retention during labor in the study group(11.85%、55.56%)were significantly higher than that of control group(5.54%,33.58%)(P=0.024,P0.001),No statistical difference was found between the two groups in the rate of dystocia(forceps delivery and cesarean section),amniotic fluid changes,the duration of the third stage,the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage,the Apgar score of newborn,the occurrence of neonatal asphyxia and postpartum urine retention.Conclusion CSEA+PCEA had adverse effect on labor progress,but it has no evident adverse effect on delivery way and mothers and infants outcome in the near future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia(CSEA)and patient-control epidural analgesia(PCEA)has influence on labor progress,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome.Methods Cases data of 406 healthy nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed,study group(345 cases)accepted CSEA+PCEA and control group(282 cases)without CSEA+PCEA,to compare the labor progress,delivery way and the maternal and fetal outcome.Results The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the study group[(223.33 ±105.85)min,(59.29 ±33.155)min]were significantly longer than that of control group[(176.14±99.66)min,(46.71±33.69)]min(P0.01),the rate of augmentation by oxytocin and the occurrence of arrested active phase in the study group(60.00%,6.67%)were significantly higher than that of control group(27.68%,2.34%)(P0.001,P=0.034),The rate of cesarean section and urinary retention during labor in the study group(11.85%、55.56%)were significantly higher than that of control group(5.54%,33.58%)(P=0.024,P0.001),No statistical difference was found between the two groups in the rate of dystocia(forceps delivery and cesarean section),amniotic fluid changes,the duration of the third stage,the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage,the Apgar score of newborn,the occurrence of neonatal asphyxia and postpartum urine retention.Conclusion CSEA+PCEA had adverse effect on labor progress,but it has no evident adverse effect on delivery way and mothers and infants outcome in the near future.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study whether combined spinal-epidural analgesia(CSEA)and patient-control epidural analgesia(PCEA)has influence on labor progress,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome.Methods Cases data of 406 healthy nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed,study group(345 cases)accepted CSEA+PCEA and control group(282 cases)without CSEA+PCEA,to compare the labor progress,delivery way and the maternal and fetal outcome.Results The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the study group[(223.33 ±105.85)min,(59.29 ±33.155)min]were significantly longer than that of control group[(176.14±99.66)min,(46.71±33.69)]min(P0.01),the rate of augmentation by oxytocin and the occurrence of arrested active phase in the study group(60.00%,6.67%)were significantly higher than that of control group(27.68%,2.34%)(P0.001,P=0.034),The rate of cesarean section and urinary retention during labor in the study group(11.85%、55.56%)were significantly higher than that of control group(5.54%,33.58%)(P=0.024,P0.001),No statistical difference was found between the two groups in the rate of dystocia(forceps delivery and cesarean section),amniotic fluid changes,the duration of the third stage,the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage,the Apgar score of newborn,the occurrence of neonatal asphyxia and postpartum urine retention.Conclusion CSEA+PCEA had adverse effect on labor progress,but it has no evident adverse effect on delivery way and mothers and infants outcome in the near future.

Key concepts: Medicine, Asphyxia, Apgar score, Anesthesia, Combined spinal epidural, Forceps delivery, Oxytocin, Cephalic presentation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of combined spinal epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor,delivery way and mothers and infants outcome — Research Paper | ScholarLens