2006PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of multilocus sequence typing system and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in typing of Salmonella enteritidis].

Rong Ji, Yanjun Li, Yuping Wang, Shenghui Cui, Tao Jiang

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminatory ability between multilocus sequence typing system (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). METHODS: Salmonella enteritidis strains, isolated from food in China were identified by MLST, under PCR products of thrA, purE, sucA, aroC, hemD, dnaN and Sdf I. The same set of strains was typed by PFGE using Xba I, Spe I as the restriction enzyme in order to compare the discriminatory power of the methods. RESULTS: Data from MLST revealed the lack of diversity among the strains of the same serotype and the number of variable nucleotide sites per locus ranged from 1 to 23 between Salmonella typhi LT2 and other serotypes of Salmonella. However, 50 Salmonella enteritidis strains were identified as 11 patterns and more sub-patterns by PFGE. CONCLUSION: In strain typing, PFGE was the highly discriminatory method comparing to the MLST system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminatory ability between multilocus sequence typing system (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). METHODS: Salmonella enteritidis strains, isolated from food in China were identified by MLST, under PCR products of thrA, purE, sucA, aroC, hemD, dnaN and Sdf I. The same set of strains was typed by PFGE using Xba I, Spe I as the restriction enzyme in order to compare the discriminatory power of the methods. RESULTS: Data from MLST revealed the lack of diversity among the strains of the same serotype and the number of variable nucleotide sites per locus ranged from 1 to 23 between Salmonella typhi LT2 and other serotypes of Salmonella. However, 50 Salmonella enteritidis strains were identified as 11 patterns and more sub-patterns by PFGE. CONCLUSION: In strain typing, PFGE was the highly discriminatory method comparing to the MLST system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the discriminatory ability between multilocus sequence typing system (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). METHODS: Salmonella enteritidis strains, isolated from food in China were identified by MLST, under PCR products of thrA, purE, sucA, aroC, hemD, dnaN and Sdf I. The same set of strains was typed by PFGE using Xba I, Spe I as the restriction enzyme in order to compare the discriminatory power of the methods. RESULTS: Data from MLST revealed the lack of diversity among the strains of the same serotype and the number of variable nucleotide sites per locus ranged from 1 to 23 between Salmonella typhi LT2 and other serotypes of Salmonella. However, 50 Salmonella enteritidis strains were identified as 11 patterns and more sub-patterns by PFGE. CONCLUSION: In strain typing, PFGE was the highly discriminatory method comparing to the MLST system.

Key concepts: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, Multilocus sequence typing, Typing, Biology, Salmonella enteritidis, Serotype, Salmonella, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of multilocus sequence typing system and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in typing of Salmonella enteritidis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens