2009Huaxi yixueRequires access

Internal Limiting Membrane Removal in Macular Hole Surgery

Cui Min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To observe whether the vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling or without ILM peeling is more suitable for macular hole.Methods:We studied 40 eyes of 39 patients with an macular hole.The patients were divided into group A(20 eyes of 20 patients) who underwent the vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling and group B(20 eyes of 19 patients) who underwent vitrectomy surgery.Routine examinations were conducted during the 6-month follow-up period.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography(OCT) were checked after surgery.Results:There was no statistics difference in best corrected-visual acuity between the two groups before surgery.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,ERG and number of closed hole after surgery in group A were better than that in group B.The VEP findings between the two groups at 6 months post-treatment were comparable.Conclusion:The vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling is more suitable than the vitrectomy for macular hole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To observe whether the vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling or without ILM peeling is more suitable for macular hole.Methods:We studied 40 eyes of 39 patients with an macular hole.The patients were divided into group A(20 eyes of 20 patients) who underwent the vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling and group B(20 eyes of 19 patients) who underwent vitrectomy surgery.Routine examinations were conducted during the 6-month follow-up period.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography(OCT) were checked after surgery.Results:There was no statistics difference in best corrected-visual acuity between the two groups before surgery.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,ERG and number of closed hole after surgery in group A were better than that in group B.The VEP findings between the two groups at 6 months post-treatment were comparable.Conclusion:The vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling is more suitable than the vitrectomy for macular hole.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To observe whether the vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling or without ILM peeling is more suitable for macular hole.Methods:We studied 40 eyes of 39 patients with an macular hole.The patients were divided into group A(20 eyes of 20 patients) who underwent the vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling and group B(20 eyes of 19 patients) who underwent vitrectomy surgery.Routine examinations were conducted during the 6-month follow-up period.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography(OCT) were checked after surgery.Results:There was no statistics difference in best corrected-visual acuity between the two groups before surgery.The best corrected-visual acuity,visual field,ERG and number of closed hole after surgery in group A were better than that in group B.The VEP findings between the two groups at 6 months post-treatment were comparable.Conclusion:The vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling is more suitable than the vitrectomy for macular hole.

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Medicine, Macular hole, Internal limiting membrane, Visual acuity, Ophthalmology, Visual field, Optical coherence tomography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Internal Limiting Membrane Removal in Macular Hole Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens