2007The Chinese Journal of DermatovenereologyRequires access

Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methodologies for Chlamydia Trachomatis

Jinping Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare three methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing on C.trachomatis.Methods McCoy cells were cultured in 96-well plates and 24-well plates with RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum.When the cells came to confluency,the suspension of C.trachomatis in SPG was inoculated onto the monolayers of McCoy cells.After centrifugation,the supernatant was replaced with maintenance medium containing a serially twofold diluted antimicrobial agent.After incubation at 35℃ for 48~72h,the cultures were subjected to iodine staining,immunofluorescence staining or RT-PCR for the examination of in vitro susceptibility of six antibiotics,including erythromycin,azithromycin,clarithromycin,ofloxacin,doxycycline and tetracycline,against two reference strains of C.trachomatis,E and L3.Results For all antibiotics tested,MICs resulted from RT-PCR were consistently higher than those from other two methods,and the increase in MICs ranged from 1~8 folds.The difference was 1~2 folds between iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining.Conclusion For the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of C.trachomatis,compared with the gold standard method,RT-PCR is more objective,while iodine staining is relatively easy to carry out.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare three methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing on C.trachomatis.Methods McCoy cells were cultured in 96-well plates and 24-well plates with RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum.When the cells came to confluency,the suspension of C.trachomatis in SPG was inoculated onto the monolayers of McCoy cells.After centrifugation,the supernatant was replaced with maintenance medium containing a serially twofold diluted antimicrobial agent.After incubation at 35℃ for 48~72h,the cultures were subjected to iodine staining,immunofluorescence staining or RT-PCR for the examination of in vitro susceptibility of six antibiotics,including erythromycin,azithromycin,clarithromycin,ofloxacin,doxycycline and tetracycline,against two reference strains of C.trachomatis,E and L3.Results For all antibiotics tested,MICs resulted from RT-PCR were consistently higher than those from other two methods,and the increase in MICs ranged from 1~8 folds.The difference was 1~2 folds between iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining.Conclusion For the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of C.trachomatis,compared with the gold standard method,RT-PCR is more objective,while iodine staining is relatively easy to carry out.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare three methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing on C.trachomatis.Methods McCoy cells were cultured in 96-well plates and 24-well plates with RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum.When the cells came to confluency,the suspension of C.trachomatis in SPG was inoculated onto the monolayers of McCoy cells.After centrifugation,the supernatant was replaced with maintenance medium containing a serially twofold diluted antimicrobial agent.After incubation at 35℃ for 48~72h,the cultures were subjected to iodine staining,immunofluorescence staining or RT-PCR for the examination of in vitro susceptibility of six antibiotics,including erythromycin,azithromycin,clarithromycin,ofloxacin,doxycycline and tetracycline,against two reference strains of C.trachomatis,E and L3.Results For all antibiotics tested,MICs resulted from RT-PCR were consistently higher than those from other two methods,and the increase in MICs ranged from 1~8 folds.The difference was 1~2 folds between iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining.Conclusion For the detection of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of C.trachomatis,compared with the gold standard method,RT-PCR is more objective,while iodine staining is relatively easy to carry out.

Key concepts: Chlamydia trachomatis, Staining, Tetracycline, Microbiology, Antimicrobial, Antibiotics, Erythromycin, Ofloxacin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methodologies for Chlamydia Trachomatis — Research Paper | ScholarLens